چکیده:
The unity of two Atlantic sides from the birth date up to now passed too many ups and downs and now on it remains as one of the satiable and long life unity. After the 11 SEP, there were many ten-sions and challenges among the two Atlantic sides which face the future of this unity into the doubts and suspicions. From this point of view the existing and expansion of the NATO could be mention as a virtual challenge to the international relation Theory. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, two ways of think-ing and ideology about NATO were raised. Neo - realist perspective , dissolution of NATO, Neo - liberal-ist perspective, the continuation of NATO and the expansion of it to the East but with some new geo-graphical and topical change. With this regard, this paper tries to look to the cause of this continuation and the existing philosophy of NATO. The two perspective of Neo-realism and Neo- liberalism with the strat-egy of the NATO expansion to the east will be explained and analyzed.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"the Maine concern of Russia is creating a new division in the Europe because they believe that the expansion of NATO to the east and mem- bership of Baltic countries is a threat to the Rus- sian security and if the Baltic countries as a mem- ber of NATO, this unity will reach to the Russian border so Russia could not tolerated it and stay neutral to this issue.
In Russia–NATO council, members act as equal partner in the common interest and their aims is to create a new level of relation in which Russia en- joys the same rights with the other in different filed like crises managements and Arms Control (Karami, 2003: 134) The Transatlantic Views about NATO Conti- nuity, Expansion and Change Transatlantism or General correlation of west Europe and US inspired from historical tradition, common political–cultural Heritage and economi- cal and strategic necessity.
NATO for England is very important and essential because a powerful Atlantic unity such as a European influential column for its interest is fully needed (Ministry of defense, 1995: 12) From England's perspective NATO's success as a base for collective security could not be achieved easily so NATO must change because in recent time more threat and is threatening the Eu- rope rather than the cold war era."