چکیده:
One of the methods for studying the relation between economic growth and
international trade is considering the effects of tariff on economic growth. The
neo-classical economists believe that free trade not only has significant
benefits for every country but for all in the world, therefore, they are seeking
for laterally and multi-conceptual omission of trade restrictions and advise on
the countries with taking into consideration of specialization to do their best
in production and international division of labor with little interferences of
government in international trade.
In this paper and in order to show the effects of tariffs on economic growth, at
first we maximize the household utility function in a neo-classical model. The
period of our study is from 1961 up to 1998 lunar. The effects of tariff on
economic growth have been considered in two different scenarios. In the first
scenario, we assume that exogenous technological progress rate is equal to 2%
and depreciation exchange rate is equal to 10%. In the second scenario, the
exogenous technological progress rate is 2% and depreciation rate is 5%. The
results of both confirm that any trade restrictions may result to a reduction in
economic growth rate. In this manner, the effect of tariff rate on economic
growth in post- revolution period in comparison with pre-revolution one has
decreased due to the result of reduction in degree of openness and reduction of
population growth rate. On the other hand, any lower depreciation rate may have
a negative effect on economic growth.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"In their studies, neo-classic economists show that even some small trade distorted which the government can create on the way of transactions and international negotiations could specifically cause to reduce the productivity of capital and as a result a reduction in economic growth in a short-time transitional period.
In their studies, neo-classic economists show that even some small trade distorted which the government can create on the way of transactions and international negotiations could specifically cause to reduce the productivity of capital and as a result a reduction in economic growth in a short-time transitional period.
In their studies, neo-classic economists show that even some small trade distorted which the government can create on the way of transactions and international negotiations could specifically cause to reduce the productivity of capital and as a result a reduction in economic growth in a short-time transitional period.
On the contrary of the above mentioned reasons which bear serious disagreement of classic and neo-classic economists, there are different reasons for make use of free trade in economic literature which we can present as follows: 2-2- Current Reasons for Make Use of Free Trade Policies The abstract of discussions made by defenders of free trade is that it causes a real income and welfare for all involved countries with trade, which in itself leads to “division of labor” in the international level and then an increase in production of goods."