خلاصه ماشینی:
According to the writer, there is an inconsistency between religious exclusivism and forbearance and tolerance and it is not possible to both conclude exclusivism from the Qur’anic verses and seek to prove tolerance and forbearance.
Section Three Dialogue An Interview with Ayatollah Dr. Muhammad Sadeqi Tehrani (the author of "Tafsir Al-Furqan") In this interview, some questions around the Qur’an’s view on other religions and the responses given by ustad Sadeqi are presented.
In the second category such cases as the following are brought up as Allamah’s criticisms on interpreters and examples for each one of them are presented: exploitation of the syntactic rules; history; recognition of the verses as being Makki or Madani; absolutism of experimental sciences; contradiction with necessity of religion and rational principles.
Section Five Bibliography In this section the latest scholarly and well-researched work of the contemporary Qur’an researcher, Ayatollah Muhammad Hadi Ma’rifat, by the title of "shubahauon wa rodudon hawl al-Qur’an al-Karim" (Misconceptions and Refutations Concerning the Holy Qur’an) is introduced and reviewed.
For if they denote overall distortion, they would be inconsistent with those verses that consider the Torah and the Gospel as means of guidance and demand their obedience by the People of the Book.
Second, partial distortion would be inconsistent with the outcomes of historical criticism of the Holy Scripture and its content analysis, suggesting the Torah and the Gospel as being human.
The Qur’an and the Interfaith Dialogue Ali Fasihi The article deals with reviewing the Qur’anic viewpoint in relation to the dialogue of the followers of different religions mentioned in the Qur’an with