خلاصة:
In this prescriptive-content article, an attempt has been made to critically analyze Modarresi's research in Iran and to introduce the problems of educational-research work as resulting from four problems (sociological inappropriateness, cultural inappropriateness, logical weakness, and lack of political efficiency). The author, according to this analytical and constructed introduction, has observed one of the problems afflicting Iranians under the title of "enthusiasm." Beyond that, he presents a cognitive transcendent approach and a philosophical nominalist approach. In this effort, both the issue of the subjectivity of Iran's real problems is considered, and a cautious and non-dogmatic attitude is taken. While the method has become an excuse to address the content, the point has not remained confined within a rigid cognitive framework. Despite respect for diverse approaches, the pluralistic approach of this writing is accompanied by a kind of transcendence that begins with an illuminative motive (life-annihilationism) and, with scientific-philosophical deliberation, depicts a philosophical vision for achieving a detached, extra-conditional, and supernatural world.
ملخص الجهاز:
The Vicious Cycle of Bureaucratic Excitability and the Future of Democracy in Iran: A Mental Experimental Scheme with a Trans-Subjective Approach Dr. Hossein Saifzadeh* Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Tehran Abstract: In this prescriptive-content article, an attempt has been made to critically analyze research in Iran and identify the problems of educational and research work as stemming from four issues (sociological inappropriateness, cultural inappropriateness, logical rigidity, and lack of political efficiency).
ir The following articles by this author have been published in the Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science: “A Research on Foreign Policy Theorizing,” No. 25, Year 69; “A Systematic Conceptual Scheme for Studying Foreign Policy,” No. 26, Year 70; “Passive Participation and the Reasons for its Continuity,” No. 31, Year 73; “Transformation from Passive to Active Participation: A Theoretical Reflection,” No. 32, Year 73; “The New World Order: Transition to the Integration of Individualism with Collectivism,” No. 33, Year 73; “Central Asia: Regional Convergence, National Development, and Iran’s Role in It,” No. 40, Year 77.
Behind the richness of scholastic thought and the lack of temporal or environmental relevance of existing ideas, it is natural that developments in Iran always create “surprise”: despite a century of effort in the form of Despite two fundamental revolutions – the Constitutional Revolution and the Islamic Revolution – and moderate developments in the form of the National Movement and the Second of Khordad, in order to achieve a democratic situation, on the one hand, and also contrary to the content of modernization programs from above by the Pahlavi family and the Rafsanjani government, at the level of reality, Iranian society is still caught in the confused and abnormal transitional period.
(
, 
, 
)
