خلاصة:
The culture of societies/states can proceed in a process consisting of a kind of scientific/relative ethical structure, the process of scientific thinking, with the agenda of dynamically recognizing reality. The aforementioned ethics itself is a process consisting of overcoming difficulties as a structure, the dynamic interaction of human knowledge as a process and agenda, aiming at the necessity of recognizing valid and sustainable knowledge. The process of scientific thinking has emerged, respectively, from the compatibility of knowledge with reality, the dynamic interaction between abstract and concrete concepts, and non-absolutist knowledge. These structures, processes, and agendas in the field of debates in the discipline of International Relations shape and redefine the scientific culture for explaining and understanding international relations, so that the knowledge of this field, in the theoretical arena (decision-making) and in the practical arena (actions and reactions), aims at a range of exploration/what (explorative), description/how (descriptive), and explanation/why and prediction. In this paradigm, the tools and methods of knowledge (methodology and epistemology) and its subject and content (ontology) are also redefined.
ملخص الجهاز:
3 Theory and Meta-theory In order to understand the process of theorizing, “to second-order theorizing or meta-theoretical issues - the meaning of meta-theory and its different dimensions and its importance in International Relations - given that the debates of the discipline are no longer limited to content and all theorists implicitly have “meta-theoretical commitments,” with the aim of increasing understanding of global politics through a more indirect approach focusing on (1)-knowledge can be considered the result of human search for knowing the true from oneself and the surrounding world.
Furthermore, the reality under investigation, of the material type that can be observed and effective, is fundamentally different in nature from mental reality, and is in dynamic interaction, and humans can redefine this process, considering its audience to be people who deal with dynamic politics and international relations, “a policy that is both science and art in solving the problems ahead and adapting to scientific reality” (Sari’ al-Qalam 138:1).
Now we are seeking to begin, in a prelude to the Tehran School, based on redefined science in international relations that consists of structure (the process of relative culture), process (dynamic interaction (interaction) 3 of cause and transformation both from causal relationship cause) and effect and from co-variation relationship between concepts) and agenda (theoretical explanation, prediction and overcoming the difficulties of the process of life), a dynamic theory about the “process of politics (international or global)” 4 including structure (the process of the international to global system), process (dynamic interaction between the process of decision-making, action and reaction in the international community or (1)-Reality has both a material and a semantic nature.
(
, 
, 
)
