خلاصة:
The nineteenth, twenty-second, and twenty-third clauses of the policies of a resistant economy refer to the issue of economic security and health, which are considered foundational elements of economic growth, by emphasizing the transparency of the economy, its sanitization, and the prevention of actions, activities, and contexts that lead to corruption in monetary, commercial, and related fields. Economic corruption is considered one of the most important factors disrupting economic security and health; in conditions where the enemy focuses on the weaknesses of a country's economy, this issue can cause instability and reduce the economic resistance of a country in an economic war. On the other hand, if economic corruption occurs through various political, economic, cultural, and legal channels, this problem will be doubled; as it weakens the internal structure of the country's economy, it reduces the country's economic resistance against internal and external harms. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the causes and factors of economic corruption, identify the pathways through which corruption occurs, and take serious action to confront it. The present article is a qualitative analysis and, using home-based and documentary studies, a theoretical framework for analyzing the contexts of economic corruption occurrence has been presented. While stating the various cultural, political, economic, and legal contexts of economic corruption, the analysis addresses these contexts and the relationships that exist regarding them.
ملخص الجهاز:
Cases such as the failure to observe meritocracy in key positions, especially in the sectors and economic organizations, which are themselves significant factors for the formation of corruption, the vast and administrative, lack of proper financial security for employees and managers, lack of correct internal and external supervision of processes, lack of transparency in administrative processes, parallel work, excess in administrative hierarchy, use of outdated administrative systems, cumbersome and obsolete administrative laws, managers of some agencies may not consider exercising supervision and control over their respective environments as one of their primary duties or, in practice, do not place it among their main work priorities, failure to announce supervisory actions as one of the important indicators for evaluating managers, absence of efficient auditing and inspection units with sufficient resources in some executive agencies, lack of efficient and specialized manpower in the public sector, improper and unfair distribution of incomes and administrative facilities among employees, weakness in the stability of managements and the creation of job insecurity for employees, existence of excessive, general, and undefined powers for some managers and employees, weakness of the appropriate administrative incentive and disciplinary system, weakness in the influence of a desirable organizational culture on administrative corruption are the most important possible deficiencies in the bureaucratic pillars of a country that create the ground for many economic corruptions (Ghorbani, 2016) 3.
(
, 
, 
)
