خلاصة:
Mulla Sadra's works – whether philosophic or non-philosophic – contain varied propositions – rational، scientific، revelation-based and intuitive. He has however، made abundant use of revealed and intuitive propositions. This has raised controversy among Muslim scholars on the place of these two epistemic sources in transcendental theosophy and their role in this philosophical system. Study shows there are some nine theories in this regard. Though some theories like the one that indicates that transcendental theosophy is a combination of different theories in line with religious doctrines are somewhat acceptable others suffer from certain flaws. This article supports the view that in his transcendental theosophy، Mulla Sadra makes use of definite revealed and intuitive propositions as a middle term in philosophical arguments
ملخص الجهاز:
The Position of Traditional Evidence and Intuition in the System of Transcendent Wisdom and a Critique and Review of Viewpoints Hasan Rezaei 1 Abstract Throughout Mulla Sadra's philosophical and non-philosophical works, various types and categories of propositions exist.
Therefore, to understand the essence and nature of Mulla Sadra's philosophical approach, how these two are applied, and to defend his philosophical system of Transcendent Wisdom, it is necessary first to examine the position of transmitted and intuitive evidence in Mulla Sadra's thought and its application in reasoning and the acquisition of rational knowledge and the justification of religious beliefs.
Second: Considering the primacy of existence as a 'given principle' (asl-e mawdu'ah), which is Haeri's most important evidence for his view, is a strange matter that, based on the common meaning of 'given principle' in Islamic philosophy, does not seem correct; because Sadra has provided detailed discussions regarding the explanation, proof, and removal of objections to the primacy of existence (Izadi and Faramarz Gharamaleki, 1386, pp.
By examining the philosophical and non-philosophical works of Sadr al-Muta'allihin, it can be clearly observed that Mulla Sadra has adopted two approaches for proving his philosophical discussions and the role of transmitted evidences (including verses and traditions) and discovery and intuition: the first approach can be considered the famous and common approach, and the second approach is a perspective that he has presented subtly throughout his theoretical discussions and employed with delicacy.
(
, 
, 
)
