خلاصة:
Governmental budgeting, as a ground for public resource distribution,
is one of the most important economic subjects, and also considered as
one of the most important areas for the distribution of rent. Countries
with high intervention and a big size of the government in the
economy, government and government budget will play a significant
role in the distribution of resources, and for this reason, it will be in
the center of attention of different individuals and groups to gain
economic and non-economic benefits. The side effects of a rentier
economy have led economists to seek solutions to reduce the grounds
of rent-seeking and lead the economy towards a productive and
entrepreneurial economy. In this regard, the current study we seek to
pathologize the process of budget bill ratification in the sense of the
rent-creation groundwork, and represent the needed solutions for the
correction and improvement of the process, aiming the alleviation of
corruption groundwork and implementation of the 19th article of the
General Policies of Eghtesad-e-Moghavemati. This descriptiveanalytical
study has identified five major problems in the ratification
process, which are rooted in the absence of the basis of expertiseoriented
decision-making. And we attempt to provide some solutions
with regard to other researches findings and practices of some
countries.
ملخص الجهاز:
Reform and Reduction of the Grounds for Creating Rent in the Budget Bill Approval Process in the Islamic Consultative Assembly of Iran Date Received: 1397/7/8 Date Accepted: 1399/7/30 ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ Javad Kojoori Haraj * Abstract Government budgeting, as a platform for the distribution of public resources, is also considered one of the most important sources of rent distribution.
In this regard, the present research, in order to reduce the grounds for corruption and implement Clause 19 of the general policies of the resistant economy, attempts to use a descriptive-analytical method to identify the damages in the budget bill approval process in terms of the grounds for creating rent and provide the necessary solutions for improving and reforming this process.
This research, while identifying five major flaws in the approval process including the budgeting method, weakness of expertise in budget decisions in the parliament, the information dependency of the parliament on the executive branch, the dominance of a sectoral-logical view in approving the budget bill, and the lack of time for reviewing the budget bill, attempts to provide solutions by considering the experience of some countries and other conducted research.
The allocation of public resources to maintain bureaucratic and inefficient structures in current Iranian budgeting on one hand, and the necessity of paying attention to programs, long-term policies, and high-level documents on the other, has caused ambiguities, lack of transparency, and complexities in the state budgeting method in the Iranian economy, which will make expert work in the approval process difficult.
(
, 
, 
)
