خلاصة:
One of the most prominent challanges in the field of narration is the entry of fake narrations and also plagiarising narrations issued by the Infallibles (as),and this is one of the most irreparable challenges in the history of Islam, which has caused distrust in the document and text of some narrations and a doubtful view of them. One of the areas that has been seriously damaged by the arrival of this pestilence is the narrations and the subject of Mahdaviat. Although many efforts have been made by the Infallibles (as) to keep people away from this harm, but the entry of this problem has changed some areas of Mahdavi education, albeit slightly. This research has been done in order to represent the extent of this effect in some of these areas and after reviewing some narrative data, has analyzed the document and their content. Findings show that in cases where the narration of the Infallible (as) is not certain, and there is a possibility of falsification and distortion, accuracy and reflection on the source, document and content of the narration seems more necessary. Because most of the harms that have befallen the teachings of Mahdaviat arise from the same counterfeiting and distortion in these narrations. And these harms have a negative and significant effect on the efficiency of the mentioned teachings.
ملخص الجهاز:
The findings of the research indicate that in cases where certainty regarding the issuance of a narration from the Infallible( is not achieved, and the possibility of fabrication and distortion arises, precision and reflection on the source, chain of transmission, and content of the narration becomes more necessary, because most of the damages that have encompassed the teachings of Mahdaviyat are the result of this very forgery and distortion in the aforementioned narrations.
It is worth mentioning that some have said words in justification of or in response to this transmission, including that it is possible the narrator transmitted it with a Tashiif (textual error) and the proposition of the hadith might be "yuwafiqu ismu ibnihi isma abi" meaning, his son's name will agree with my father's name; not that "yuwafiqu ismu abihi is my father's name" so that the meaning would be that his father's name agrees with my father's name (Nahaondi, 1386: Vol. 1, 327; Safi Golpayegani, 1419: Vol. 2, 205).
Sayyid Muhammad Sadr has mentioned three points in criticizing this narration: First: This hadith was not narrated from the Messenger of Allah( but rather from Ibn Abbas, and it is not fundamentally a proof or evidence, and it cannot prove a doctrinal or historical issue.
Another example; Mahdi from the lineage of Hasan ibn Ali( Among other statements fabricated in the discussions of Mahdism, some are Sunni reports that explicitly state that the Mahdi( is from the lineage of Imam al-Mujtaba( .
(
, 
, 
)
