خلاصة:
Within Imam Khomeini's political perspective and approach, some elements have deepened the method of ijtihad (jurisprudential reasoning) in seminaries at two levels: "subject comprehension" and "ruling comprehension." This research aims to identify the components of Imam Khomeini's political approach that have influenced the "conventional method of ijtihad." Utilizing an analytical-comparative method and a second-order perspective on the method of ijtihad, this study endeavors to dissect how his political thought relates to a "dynamic style of ijtihad" and to reflect on its consequences compared to the "Jawahiri method of ijtihad." The findings of the research indicate that the "political actions and duties," derived from the interpretation of "subjects" and "texts" through the "method of ijtihad," have undergone a shift in approach at the levels of texts and subjects of rulings. Imam Khomeini's social, governmental, and systematic approach led to a transformation in the understanding of subjects and texts from an individual, abstract, and static sphere to the realm of political-social and governmental action. Ultimately, this shift elevated the ijtihad method in seminaries from a "static" state to a "dynamic" one.
ملخص الجهاز:
72 Transcendent Politics, Winter (Special Issue), Vol. 11, 2023 The Role of Imam Khomeini's Political Approach 1 in Advancing the "Hawza Method of Ijtihad" Gholamhasan Moghimi Assistant Professor, Department of Contemporary History and Islamic Civilization, Higher Education Complex of History, Biography and Islamic Civilization, Al-Mustafa International University, Qom, Iran.
Imam Khomeini's social, governmental, and systemic approach caused jurisprudential subjectology and textology to move beyond the individual, abstract, and static realm, transforming into the sphere of socio-political and governmental action, and ultimately upgrading the ijtihad style of the seminaries from a "static" to a "dynamic" state.
). This means that the subject of a jurisprudential ruling cannot be separated from its social and governmental relations; otherwise, its real concept and essence, 76 Transcendent Politics, Winter (Special Issue), Year 11, 1402 remains hidden from the eyes of the jurist and does not fall under its true proofs and texts; consequently, Ijtihad practically loses its effectiveness in responding to the issues of the time.
Jurists discuss the causes and reasons for the change of the subjects of rulings under two general headings: A) Causes of change in objective matters, such as: "transformation and revolution" like the purity of a salted pig in a salt marsh, "transfer" such as the transfer of human blood to a mosquito's body which becomes pure and clean, "consumption and mixture" such as the falling of a drop of The role of Imam Khomeini's political approach in advancing the "method of seminary ijtihad" 83 wine in a jug of vinegar, which is considered pure.
(
, 
, 
)
