خلاصة:
In Deleuze: The Clamor of Being, Badiou presents his views on Deleuze's ontology, and by enumerating some features in Deleuze's view, he finally calls him a philosopher of the one who relies on the Stoic view of what overthrows Plato. The reader was unsuccessful and his philosophical project has not achieved anything in the end except the surrender of plurality to unity. For Badiou, who considers only the mission of the contemporary philosopher to break away from the concept of unity in any way, concepts such as the spiritual communion of existence and the eternal return will only reach the equality of existence and unity, and even the difference in Deleuze ontology will ultimately be a function of the "same" and a single leader. In this article, we will try to enumerate some of Badiou's critiques on the relationship between Deleuze and the Stoic view, as well as apply the concept of eternal return and his view of Deleuze as a philosopher of the one thing and finally, defend difference and repetition as multiplicity based versions and show that the fundamental root of Badiou's critiques can be seen in his incoherent conception of unity and the deliberate confusion of the concepts of the spiritual commonality of existence and unity.
ملخص الجهاز:
Deleuze: Philosopher of the One Thing (A Defense Against Badiou's Critiques of Deleuze with Emphasis on the Concept of Eternal Return) Zahra Sara Namayandegi, PhD student in Pure Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran Ali Fath Taheri Associate Professor of Philosophy, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran Abstract In his book "Deleuze: The Trouble with Being," Badiou presents his views on Deleuze's ontology and, by enumerating certain characteristics in Deleuze's paradigm, ultimately calls him the philosopher of the one thing, who, by relying on a Stoic perspective, has been unsuccessful in what is called the inversion of Plato, and whose philosophical project has ultimately achieved nothing but the surrender of multiplicity to the One. For Badiou, who considers the unique mission of the contemporary philosopher to be the rupture from the concept of the One at all costs, concepts such as the ontological participation of being and also eternal return will merely lead to the equality of being and the One, and even difference in Deleuze's ontology will ultimately be subject to the "same" and the guidance of the One. In this article, we will attempt, while enumerating some of Badiou's critiques regarding the connection between Deleuze and the Stoic paradigm and also the use of the concept of eternal return and his perception of Deleuze as the philosopher of the one thing, to present a critique of Badiou's critiques and finally defend the ontology of difference and repetition as a version based on multiplicity, and show that the fundamental root of Badiou's critiques can be found in his inconsistent perception of the One and the deliberate confusion of the concepts of ontological participation of existence and the One .
(
, 
, 
)
