خلاصة:
The examination and reliance on the famous understanding of a text has a significant impact on the method of inference, which is addressed in this writing; its impact on inference is considered among the issues of the science of Usul. Regarding the compensation for the weakness of indication by relying on the famous understanding, in the words of jurists, mere claims of agreement or disagreement with it exist scattered without mentioning evidence. In this brief work, the arguments of the discussion along with their critique and analysis are mentioned in detail. The result is that if a person is certain of the agreement of the famous understanding with themselves, they act upon it; however, if they investigate the cause of a different interpretation or a difference of opinion between the famous understanding and themselves, they face various possibilities, in each case a specific ruling applies, and the derivation from the famous understanding to compensate for the weakness of indication varies.
ملخص الجهاز:
In the case of conformance between our understanding and the famous, the first scenario is that the appearance of the text is complete according to us, and it is clear that when we have performed an Istizhar and its probative force (hujjiyat) is established, the famous understanding is considered a confirmer and supporter of our understanding, leaving no room for discussion or objection.
/ For example: The late Imam Khomeini, in the discussion of the conditions of two compensations in the book Al-Bay', considers the third condition to be knowledge of the amount of the price (thaman), and in the process of explaining the evidence for this condition, says: «The basis in this condition (knowledge of the thaman) after the claim of consensus (ijma') and absence of disagreement, is not the hadith of gharar, and although we have previously disputed the indication of this hadith, in fairness, it 101 is that due to the understanding of the scholars of both groups (Shi'a and Sunni), attention is not paid to contrary possibilities» (Khomeini, 1421, Vol. 3, p.
Therefore, since there is a prohibition in applying practical principles (usul amaliyyah) in all cases where we lack knowledge and certainty, we are forced to act upon texts whose appearance is not complete but for which a clue regarding their correctness has been established (reason, in the manner of discovery or governance, accepts the probative force of the understanding of the famous).
(
, 
, 
)
