خلاصة:
The Holy Prophet (PBUH) as the last divine messenger is considered a mercy for all the worlds so that his attribute of kindness and compassion overcomes all his other characteristics. In his view, all human beings have a respectable soul and they cannot be destroyed. As in the behavior and practical life of the Prophet (PBUH) this method can be seen clearly. Some people, based on weak and unreliable reports, are trying to equate the killing of some of his opponents and enemies with the method of terrorism. The results of this article by descriptive-analytical method indicate that in addition to the weakness of the document and the unreliability of such reports, there is evidence in their text that shows that their killing is by no means an assassination in the modern sense. On the other hand, the Prophetic biography (PBUH) was always based on tolerance and kindness to the opponents and did not fight the enemies as much as possible.
ملخص الجهاز:
This writing, using a descriptive-analytical method, states that in addition to these reports being weak and unreliable in terms of chain of narration, evidence is found in their text showing that their killing is in no way an instance of terrorization in the modern sense, and the Prophetic Seerah has always been based on tolerance and kindness toward opponents, and the Great Prophet, peace be upon him and his family, did not fight or struggle with enemies as much as possible.
The existence of some unclear and weak reports in Islamic sources has caused some skeptics to seek to instill the doubt that what is performed today under the name of terror and sudden acts of murder against others should be considered among Muslims as stemming from a practice whose founder was the Messenger of God, peace be upon him and his family.
86); thus, fundamentally, the killing and terrorizing of opponents by His Eminence himself, which is claimed to be a current Sunnah, is non-existent; however, regarding whether the Prophet, peace be upon him and his family, had ordered the terror of an individual, it must be said that in some historical books and narrative sources, reports and narrations are seen that have caused some to consider them as instances of terror, which we will examine in the following.
(
, 
, 
)
