خلاصة:
One of the most important issues in religious teachings is the relationship between science and religion, which was first appeared in the West and then found its way into Islamic theology and caused much controversy. Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, as a philosopher and Quranic commentator, has discussed this issue in his various books and has proposed his theory as the "theory of discovery". This theory delineates the position of reason along with the other tools of religious knowledge. The present study, using the descriptive-analytical method, first explains the theory of discovery with a critical stance and then attempts to provide a critique of thestructure of this geometry, emphasizing its adherence to the verbal commonality of the experimental sciences and its idealistic conception of experimental sciences. The study shows that, to understand the nature of the new experimental sciences, one must examine the true evolution of the experimental sciences, so that its place in the geometry of religious knowledge can be accurately mapped.
ملخص الجهاز:
A Critical Look at the Position of Empirical Sciences in Ayatollah Javadi Amoli's Theory of Disclosure Hassan Zarnooshe Farahani Saber Khalili Abstract One of the most important topics raised in religious studies is the relationship between science and religion, which was first discussed in the West and then found its way into Islamic theology, creating a wide variety of differing opinions.
Some experts have also dedicated themselves to critiquing his "Theory of Science Disclosure," including: Mohammad Reza Khaki Gharamaleki in the article "Critical Observations on the Theoretical Foundations of Religious Science from the Perspective of Allameh Javadi Amoli," who, in addition to critiquing the structure of the disclosure theory, has also addressed the influence of the Western worldview in creating new sciences in his other works, such as the Analysis of the Identity of Religious Science and Modern Science, and Religion and Ideology in the Process of the Rise and Fall of Modernity; also Mohammad Fanaei Ashkouri in the article "The Position of Reason and Revelation in the Geometry of Religious Knowledge," and Mohammad Karami in the article "Examination and Critique of Abdullah Javadi Amoli's Theory of Religious Science" to the logical and structural critique of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli's theory.
Thus, Bacon challenged Aristotle in two positions; one being that Aristotelian science is teleological, meaning that in fact, the learner studies purposeful behaviors, and this Ayeneh Marefat Scientific Journal, Year 21, Issue 66, Spring 2021 __________________________________________________________________________________________ is the same thing that is considered in religious sciences by Ayatollah Javadi Amoli and was removed by Bacon from the foundations of this science; and furthermore, the method of acquiring this knowledge was the intuition of the ideal world, in which a negligible role was assigned to sensory experience.
(
, 
, 
)
