خلاصة:
Interpretability or the existence of sacred texts and scriptures has been one of the issues raised by Muslim and non-Muslim thinkers. "Interpretation" has been used in the topic of interpretationOne of the most important issues in the Qur'anic sciences is the problem of understanding the analogies and the scholars of interpretation in terms of who is qualified to interpret the analogies, including disputes between scholars, especially Shiite and Sunni commentators. Compare the data and opinions of Fakhr Razi and Mulla SadraAccording to the above verse, some scholars consider the science of interpretation to be analogous to God alone, and others do not consider it exclusive to God. Mulla Sadra excludes interpretation from being confined to the domain of language, believing that every phenomenon has interpretation and interpretation. Believes in a certain way and considers the perfect example of Rasikhan in science in addition to the infallible non-infallible scholars.Fakhr Razi, on the other hand, believes that the only Almighty God is aware of the interpretation of the parallels. From their point of view, lack of knowledge of the interpretation of the parallels does not mean denying the existence of God; We also have faithAlthough science is not similar to verses.
ملخص الجهاز:
Science and Religion Studies, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies A semi-annual scientific journal (scientific-research article), Year 11, Issue 1, Spring and Summer 2020, 197 – 219 A Comparative Study of the Views of Fakhr al-Din al-Razi and Mulla Sadra Regarding Those Knowledgeable in the Interpretation of Ambiguous Verses Abdolkarim Kashvari * Jahangir Masoudi **, Jafar Morvarid *** Abstract Whether sacred texts and heavenly books are subject to interpretation (ta'wil) or not has been among the issues raised among Muslim and non-Muslim thinkers.
Mulla Sadra believed in a special harmony between the understanding of ambiguous verses and the understanding of the universe, and he considers the full embodiment of those firmly grounded in knowledge (rasikhun fi al-ilm) to include non-infallible scholars in addition to the infallible ones.
" And others do not consider the scholars of the interpretation of ambiguous verses to be exclusive to God, which this research can, by examining the views Mulla Sadra as a representative of Transcendent Wisdom (who, in addition to the Infallibles (peace be upon them), considers the complete embodiment of those firmly grounded in knowledge to be non-infallible scholars and greats who have attained truths of the universe through the power of intellect and by maintaining inner purity) and Fakhr al-Razi as a representative of the Ash'arites (who believe that only God Almighty is aware of the correct ta'wil of the ambiguous verses and no one other than Him is aware of them) can further help clarify the subject.
(
, 
, 
)
