خلاصة:
the purpose of this research is to answer the question, what is the relationship between god and the universe from the perspective of mirza javad tehrani? for this purpose, his written works were analyzed by means of content analysis of sources in a library manner. sages in response to this question of rational assumptions such as; they have used the principle of causation, falsification, composition, the principle of oneness, the subject of manifestation, etc., and by proposing a separation between the first creation and the first emission, they have considered the relationship as an existential matter. mirza javad, one of the thinkers of the separation school, while not accepting the aforementioned principles, does not consider the claim of the sages to be free of problems. he believes that determining the example of the first creature and expressing the type of relationship is beyond the realm of human knowledge, so we must obey the sharia texts in this regard. therefore, the relationship between god and the universe is definitely established. although its quality is unknown to us.
ملخص الجهاز:
First, it is necessary to introduce the two terms, existence and essence, from the perspective of Mirza Jawad, and then to establish the point of contention between him and the philosophers and mystics, so that the intellectual foundation and principles of their critique of Transcendent Wisdom become clear.
because reason, having neither perceived the sacred essence of the Exalted Creator itself nor observed the quality of creation and origination, how can it discover such a definitive judgment about Him?" (Tehrani 1367: 220) The summary of Mirza Javad's discourse regarding the invalidation of the principle of homogeneity is as follows: First—existence is an abstract and conventional matter; therefore, basing the relationship between cause and effect on the semantic sharing of existence is fundamentally invalid; thus, the existential relationship and similarity between the Creator and the created is invalid.
Mirza Javad rejects the second and third views and asserts that a necessary implication of discussing the issue of origination is the acceptance of homogeneity between the Creator and the created; and since we have no valid rational or transmitted proof that is justified and certain regarding the necessity and establishment of homogeneity between the Creator and the created, therefore the discussion of origination, as the philosophers believe, is invalid, because on one hand, reason has not perceived the sacred essence of the Exalted Creator itself, and on the other hand, it is not capable of observing the quality of His creation and origination.
(
, 
, 
)
