خلاصة:
One of the major characteristics of the modern era is the disregard for moral foundations in organizing social relations and drafting legal provisions. On the other hand, it is appropriate that chastity, as a value phenomenon, a quality, and an internal virtue that shapes character and form, be analyzed and evaluated through rational and traditional methods in examining the causes and factors of legal, moral, and social challenges. The aim of writing this article is to examine the impact of chastity on the mental health of the individual, family, and society. Since legal tendencies arise from intellectual attitudes, first, the position of this valuable quality in the formulation of laws and rights is evaluated, and its instances in social rights are mentioned from the perspective of the Holy Quran; then, the role of collective will in social destiny is examined. Additionally, regarding verbal interactions and the observance of speaking rights, the role of chastity in promoting healthy linguistic communication is evaluated. Due to the specific audience-oriented method of the Holy Quran, types of verbal interactions are discussed, and after comparing divine and non-divine legal systems, the role of moral foundations in the formation of social and legal issues is stated.
ملخص الجهاز:
1. And whether those who gravitated towards historical and investigative schools and considered law the result of reflecting general needs that have gradually formed over time and sought the roots of laws in the (national spirit)—and people such as "Savigny," the famous German jurist, who considered law the product of the general conscience and the historical evolution of human society, and after him individuals such as "Burke" in England, "Vico" in Italy, and "Montesquieu" in France who completed it—or the proponents of empirical schools who, due to the influence of "Bacon's" ideas, which unlike the method of the sages of previous schools—who emphasized "rationalism" in law—suddenly based themselves on empirical sciences and observation, and people such as "John Stuart Mill" who wanted to moderate their theories by proposing "moral conscience," or the proponents of the theory of natural evolution like "Darwin" and "Spencer," or those who developed a tendency toward expediency and "pragmatism," despite their different perspectives, all emphasized that humanity in its social movement must reach the moderation and realization of the principle of justice; (Katouzian, Philosophy of Law, Vol. 1, Summary of Chapter 1) but because sometimes conflicts and substantive differences arose between the theories and the outcomes of perspectives supporting the realization of justice, the result and achievement of these thoughts was different from what they think of in the theoretical field.
(
, 
, 
)
