خلاصة:
One of the currents that was able to find an acceptable position in the humanities in opposition to positivism was the current of contractualism. Contractualism, in some of its branches including the study of organizations, seeks to utilize the epistemic fruits of various paradigms and strives to make use of all existing and possible possibilities for understanding the organization. A prominent example of this effort is Morgan's use of various metaphors employed to understand the organization. This current, without regard to the existence of reciprocal foundations in different paradigms, has nurtured a contradictory recommendation within itself. In contrast to this approach, this writing proposes Allama Tabataba'i's meta-theory of credentialism as a stronger version for the humanities, which is capable of providing an increasing capacity before Morgan's perspective.
ملخص الجهاز:
Philosophical Foundations of Morgan's Metaphors In Management and the Meta-theory of Allamah Tabataba'i's Constructivism Seyyed Hamidreza Hasani * Hadi Mousavi ** Abstract One of the currents that was able to find an acceptable position in the human sciences in opposition to positivism was the constructivist current.
Morgan's Point of Departure from the Positivist Approach In his research, Morgan, by resorting to the scientific philosophy principle of "theory ladenness"1, observations that caused his distrust of sensory observations, resorts to cases of empirical research based on the fact that observers of different cultures see a single image in various ways.
utility, in this case, despite the fact that the possibilities of the positivist paradigm with positivist methods and anthropology for understanding the organization are different from the possibilities of interpretive, hermeneutic, or critical paradigms, and each of these paradigms strives to provide a better image of organizational knowledge based on its cognitive possibilities through the presentation of a metaphor, it is natural that the use of any idea derived from any paradigm that can carry the title of conventions among scientists will be feasible.
According to the supra-theory of conventionalism, in addition to not facing the problem of relativism due to its possession of a realistic approach, it will not have the problem of changing the subject of research because it considers the method of studying the organization to arise from the conventional identity of the organization.
(
, 
, 
)
