خلاصة:
Corona, which was a deadly pandemic from a biological Perspective, seems to have caused people to act more intelligently in their interactions with the requirement of social distancing from a sociological Perspective. Intelligence, which has been the focus of many biological and psychological discussions, at the same time has remained far from the perspective of sociological analysis. Based on this, the present research is focused on the analysis of the role of intelligence in the interaction with the phenomenology of the lived experience of Borujerd Lak-speakers of pre/post-corona social interactions. 16 samples were selected purposefully and the data were collected through in-depth interviews and participatory observation. According to the results, " Crowd Interaction" (pre-corona) was based on crowd behavior, autocratic construction, and crowd intelligence, and "Social Interaction" (post-corona) was based on social behavior, democratic construction, and social intelligence. The findings of the present research showed that intelligence is a social component and has social functions and results that can be analyzed sociologically. In general, facing Corona has caused a transition from Crowd Interaction to Social Interaction, and intelligence as a social category has played an important role in this transition.
ملخص الجهاز:
(Ibid: 170) In an extensive search of theoretical texts, we have seen that some thinkers have provided views regarding mass behavior, imitation, decision-making based on the signs of others, collective memory, and also the role of "intelligence" in human social interactions.
In fact, the ground for cultivating social intelligence had gradually formed since the time human societies encountered modernity and before the outbreak of the Corona disease, but the confrontation with the risk of Corona, acting as a social shock, caused the individual—using the opportunity gained to distance themselves from society through Corona-related conditions—to make an "individual" effort toward rethinking, reorganizing, and even recreating interactions (although the role of communication networks, which provided scientific knowledge and became the basis for their rethinking, can also be analyzed).
An important and determining factor in changing the pattern of socialization after facing Corona has been the hiatus created in the process of previous socialization due to forced physical isolation, which has caused the younger generation to be unable to learn the customary and previous ethnic ways through "being in the midst of smart way, have applied smart reflection and changes (social intelligence) in such a way that they act deliberately and not through mere imitation; meaning, they gather the necessary information and, based on the received signs, engage in logical comparison (comparing action/reaction options and applying them to their own inclination and situation) and finally, from among the available options, adopt the optimal choice; the same choice that both preserves their individual values and allows them to benefit from the advantages of being with the group.
(
, 
, 
)
