خلاصة:
Purpose and Background: Political violence is considered as the root cause of issues such as terrorism and violent conflicts in the world. Therefore, the present article seeks to address the goal of how political violence is based on legitimacy. Also, during this research, questions are raised as the author's preoccupation; How has legitimacy been challenged? Under what circumstances is legitimacy attributed to governments or terrorist groups? What will legitimize them? In fact, the hypothesis of this article is based on the fact that today more political violence revolves around the issue of legitimacy. In this regard, first Max Weber's views on the social and psychological foundations of legitimacy are discussed, and then the main focus of the article is to evaluate Habermas's views on the relationship between political violence and legitimacy.Methods: In this study, according to the nature and type of the subject under study, after filing the content, inferential analysis was performed by analyzing documentary, library and internet data to analyze the collected data.Findings and Conclusion: Finally, the summary of opinions and analysis has shown that legitimacy, despite its inconsistencies and contradictions, deserves to be considered as one of the few sources and authorities that today are the cause of many conflicts and disputes between governments. And presented terrorist organizations.
ملخص الجهاز:
Organizing the Concept of Political Violence Centered on Legitimacy with a Focus on the Views of Habermas and Weber 1 Date of Receipt: 2020/03/05 Yaser Esmailzadeh Date of Acceptance: 2021/02/18 Abstract Goal and Background: Political violence is considered the primary root of issues such as terrorism and violent conflicts in the world.
Among the noteworthy contents about 1 Terrorism and Political Violelence Studies 2 Martha Crenshaw 3 Left-Wing Terrorists 4 Right-Wing Terrorists 5 The Situational 6 Legitimation Problems 7 Jurgen Habermas 8 Legitimacy in Legitimation Crisis 9 Max Weber The positions and views of Weber and Habermas regarding legitimacy are such that the stances of these two thinkers regarding legitimacy are completely opposed to each other.
Therefore, according to Weber, in Western societies, individuals as citizens of the state typically consider its rules and principles to be binding and thus valid or legitimate; because they believe in the legality and the rule-based nature of the procedures of these rules.
Since this new orientation toward the argumentative justification of decisions in the political sphere is considered a potential threat to the legitimacy of Western states, Habermas has claimed that this process can lead to a legitimation crisis.
Since this new orientation toward the argumentative justification of decisions in the political sphere is considered a potential threat to the legitimacy of Western states, Habermas has claimed that this process can lead to a legitimation crisis.
(
, 
, 
)
