خلاصة:
It is necessary for the administrative and executive system, as well as sometimes the quasi-judiciary, to hear these cases in special and special authorities, separate from the general courts, and to discuss the dispute. The strongest and best solution in a lawsuit is to have a fair and just trial that provides judicial security for the parties, and this is not possible except in an independent and appropriate court, the independence and impartiality of the trial authority and the guarantees of the right to defense, the right to public trial. Proper trial, independence and impartiality of the judiciary, access to principles and documents in the trial process, the manner of appointment of members of the judiciary and the reviewer can provide the need for a fair trial and be consistent with the pattern of a fair trial. However, a fair and just trial is one of the manifestations of judicial justice and the principles of fair trial are rooted in justice and therefore one of the necessities of democratic societies is the acceptance of the principle of fair trial. Therefore, it is necessary to present a plan to provide a unified and coherent structure for the above-mentioned authorities, and in addition to legal expertise, expertise in the field of administrative performance should also be provided in resolving disputes, and away from the dependence of organizations, Chapter deals with disputes over service delivery.
ملخص الجهاز:
Feasibility of drafting an administrative procedure law in quasi-judicial proceedings with attention to the principles of fair trial in a state bound by ethics 1 Jamshid Abbaszadeh Date of receipt: 98/1/25 2 Bijan Abbasi Vali Rostami 3 Date of acceptance: 98/2/11 4 Ebrahim Musazadeh Abstract The requirements of the administrative and executive system, and also partly its quasi-judicial nature, necessitate that these disputes be handled in specific and special authorities separate from general courts and resolved.
Fair Trial in the Administrative System A fair trial is a set of principles and standards whose observance by every court and every authority that issues a ruling is necessary so that through this path, the rights and freedoms of individuals are guaranteed; the principles of public and in-person proceedings, the principle of independence and impartiality of the adjudicating official, the principle of accessibility of the adjudicating body, the principle of the necessity of the possibility of appeal, and similar cases have been considered to guarantee correct results and also to protect the rights of the parties.
" Identifying the rules governing these authorities and their mode of operation helps to create a unified adjudication process, although in this path, certain components that are used as principles of fair trial in public courts must be utilized so that they guarantee the rights of the people in the resolution of administrative disputes.
(
, 
, 
)
