خلاصة:
The outbreak of World War II and the occupation of Iran by Britain and the Soviet Union gave them the chance to do whatever they wanted. The Axis countries embarked on arresting and deporting their opponents in order to control them. This descriptive-analytical study seeks to explore the trend of the detention and deportation of individuals by the Axis powers in Iran as well as the features exposed through the elements of their exile at this time in history consisting of the nature, causes of deportation, expatriates's social classes, and places of exile. The deportation of Iranians during World War II does not include their arrest and detention, their long detention and refusing to file and gather evidence to prove their guilt, the difference between the crime scenes and their places of detention (exile), as well as the type of their detention, but refers to "imprisonment in exile". The birthplace and places of exile of the expatriates was the center and north of the country. Anit-exile protesters also lived in the same areas. The policy of the Soviet and British governments regarding the deportation of Iranian citizens was the same. The deportation of effective figures brought up a gap, which caused damage to the country and was one of the factors behind the divergence of Azerbaijan and Kurdistan.
ملخص الجهاز:
Exile, World War II, Britain, Soviet Union, Arak detention center, Rasht * Corresponding author: Assistant Professor at Imam Khomeini (AS) and Islamic Revolution Research Institute.
" This research, using a descriptive-analytical method and utilizing archival documents and primary sources, seeks to answer the question: what process did the arrest and exile of individuals by the Allies in Iran undergo, and what characteristics do the components of their exile—including the nature of this act, the cause of exile, the exiles themselves, and the place of exile—show?
2. An arrest takes place at the scene of the crime, and the local court is competent to handle the crime; however, these individuals were being arrested from all over Iran and were held in three locations: Arak, the 500-bed hospital in Tehran, and Rasht; therefore, this case also does not comply with the arrest mentioned in the law.
Bullard, the British Ambassador to Iran, in response to Nasrullah Entizam, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, regarding the innocence of the exiles, requested that the publication of materials against the Allies in newspapers be avoided (Documents from the Occupation...
At 11 PM that same day, the command of the Soviet forces in Tabriz requested the arrest of the newspaper manager, and since they could not find him, they arrested his son, Seyyed Hossein, who was the internal manager of the newspaper, and exiled him to Tehran; the newspaper issues were also collected with the help of the Tudeh Party (Sakma, 293-3355).
Keywords: exile, World War II, Britain, Soviet Union, Arak Detention Center, Rasht.