خلاصة:
The constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran was revised in 1989. The question of this research is what the dominant discourses on this revision are and on what elements they focused. Reforms seem to be the result of rivalry between the Islamic leftist and rightist discourses. Islamic leftist, believed in velayat-e faghih, was trying to find a balance between the republicanism and Islamism of system and they also believed in propositions such as the impossibility of dissolving the parliament by the leadership, timing the course of leadership, the divine-people legitimacy of the government, the leader’s responsibility to people, coordination of the powers by the president, and opposition to leader’s delegate. While the Islamic rightist believed in Velayat-e Motlaghe faqih and define republicanism under Islamism Therefore, they believed in propositions such as the dissolution of the parliament, the dismissal of the president, opposition to the timing of leadership period, the divine basi3s legitimacy of the government, and the presence and involvement of a leadership delegate in executive bodies. The purpose of this study is to identify the dominant discourses on the constitution revision of Iran in 1989 based on the method of discourse analysis.
ملخص الجهاز:
The Islamic Left, while having a general belief in Velayat-e Faqih, attempted to establish a balance between the republic and the Islamism of the system and believed in propositions such as the impossibility of dissolving the Parliament by the Leader, term limits, the divine-popular legitimacy of the political system, the responsibility of the Leader towards the people, coordination between the branches of government by the President, and opposition despite the presence of the Leader's representative in executive institutions.
Another group considers the formation of the left current to have occurred during the second Majlis (Parliament), which, during the term of the third Majlis, resulted in the birth of a schism within the Society of Combatant Clergy; thus, the political duality of the "Islamic Republic Party - Organization of the Mujahideen of the Islamic Revolution" manifested as the political rivalry of left and right within the ruling establishment in the form of the duality between the "Society of Combatant Clergy and the Association of Combatant Clerics.
A: The Islamic Left Discourse Textual analysis showed that the core themes emphasized by the Islamic Left consisted of propositions such as the legalization of the duties and powers of the Velayat-e Faqih, the popular basis of the government's legitimacy, timing, the impossibility of dissolving the Parliament by the Leader, the lack of agreement despite the Leader's representatives in executive institutions, and coordination among the branches of power by the President.
(
, 
, 
)
