خلاصة:
The nature and perfection of man in view point of Roger and its critique based on Sinaitic philosophy is the subject of this paper. The school of Humanism is one of the most important schools of psychology of the twentieth century, which has serious criticisms of other schools of psychology, especially Psychoanalysis and Behaviorism. The reason for the tendency towards humanistic psychology was a situation in which psychology had been condemned for years and, by limiting itself to the study of behavior, had neglected man himself and instead focused on secondary factors. Rogers is one of the most influential psychologists in the school. As the inventor of the "person-centered treatment" method, he played a major role in advancing this school. The turning point of Rogers’s psychology can is positive attention to human beings. But while Rogers' views are progressive compared to those of previous psychologists, they do have significant drawbacks. In this paper, the principles of human nature and human perfection in Rogers psychology are analyzed and critiqued using Avecinna’s philosophy.
ملخص الجهاز:
The teachings of humanistic psychology, which were rooted in phenomenology and existentialism, instead of focusing on the unconscious mind and past experiences, focus on the healthy and current personality of the individual, and also consider individuals' perceptions of events to be more important and meaningful (Parsa, 2003, p.
In this article, first, the nature of man and also human perfection from Rogers' perspective are explained in the form of the following seven axes: human nature; the scope of human choice; the self; experience as a criterion for individual values; self-actualization; interaction with others; and human perfection.
c) The human "self" At the beginning of his professional life, Rogers, like past psychologists, sought to answer the question: "How can I change this individual?" But later he realized that this was an insufficient question; therefore, he modified his problem in this way: "How can I provide a relationship that this person can use for their personality growth?" Therefore, it seems that his therapeutic method is different from his predecessors (Rogers, 1961, p.
It is worth noting that Rogers' therapeutic method is also based on the latter point; meaning that a person should only rely on the experience they themselves have of the world; because this experience is the only reality that each individual can know; therefore, the therapist strives to provide the patient with a sense of freedom in expressing problems by creating a calm atmosphere, and in return, the therapist should not speak except in certain limited cases, and even then, only for the purpose of emphasizing and clarifying the patient's words (Schultz, 1390, p.
(
, 
, 
)
