خلاصة:
knowledge-based urban development is a new form of urban development in the 21st century, which has the potential to bring economic development to contemporary cities. this research, with the aim of achieving a proposed local framework for knowledge-based urban development, explains and evaluates the components and indicators of the knowledge-based city in pardis city. in order to achieve this goal, the desired components and indicators were determined using documentary studies and theoretical and experimental bases, and a questionnaire with 65 items was distributed among the decision-making group consisting of 40 members of the target group using the delphi method. in order to extract the best indicators, z-score method was used and based on the likert spectrum and entropy technique, the weight of components and indicators was calculated and for their prioritization, topsis technique was used. becamein the following, the research questions were answered, which are the criteria and indicators necessary to transform pardis city into a knowledge-based city and what will be their priority to achieve a successful knowledge-based city. in fact, six social , economic, managerial, perceptual, spatial organization and urban infrastructure components were defined as the proposed components for knowledge-based urban development and their related indicators. the results of the research show that the economic component with a coefficient of 0.7878 is in the first place, urban infrastructure is in the second place with a coefficient of 0.5717 and management is in the third place with a coefficient of 0.4489 in terms of importance in pardis city and in line with each of the mentioned components, the indicators related to them are prioritized and the necessary suggestions are made to transform pardis city into a knowledge-based city with the goal of regional development was presented
ملخص الجهاز:
Table 3: Component, criterion, and indicators suitable for a knowledge-based city Concept, component, criterion, indicator Knowledge-based city, economic, economic development and welfare, creating diverse capital markets to finance knowledge-based companies, investing in physical infrastructure and high-level technology, supporting knowledge-based businesses, private sector investment in educational and cultural sectors , social and cultural, social justice, standards of living, human and social capital, cultural diversity, prestigious universities, creativity and development of cultural infrastructures, creating a multi-national nature for the city, culture of sharing knowledge and experience in the city, social capital , perceptual, tranquility and vitality, proportions between open and built spaces, color, sense of belonging to the place of residence, diversity in form and materials, legibility of the urban environment, security of residents, sensory richness of residents, tranquility and vitality of residents in the environment, architectural features and urban design , urban infrastructure, sustainable urban development, the city's ability to host important national and transnational events, providing stable electricity and necessary infrastructure for energy, easy and rapid access to information technology-based services, existence of science and technology parks , spatial organization, improving quality of life, establishing knowledge-based companies near advanced technologies and specialists, access to urban services, urban diversity, improving the quality of urban space, environmental impacts, sustainable transportation, urban form and density , managerial, efficient urban management, public and private sector participation, creating opportunities for investment in scientific centers, ability to retain highly skilled citizens, increasing employment and improving salary payments, efficient urban management system, developing urban strategies based on knowledge Source: Authors' findings Subsequently, the z-score method was used to extract the selected indicators and standardize them.
(
, 
, 
)
