خلاصة:
History, in the sense of research into events that have been counted, observed, and drawn attention to by researchers during a specific period of time, and a structure of narratives about those same events has been constructed. Reality is more than history and leads it by a great margin in terms of numbers and figures. This matter leads to the birth of identity. Identity in this sense is one of the benchmarks upon which historical events can be examined. When we speak of identity as a process, we are actually speaking of the continuity of historical phenomena that arise from an individual, group, tribe, or nation in response to questions asked of them about their past. By analyzing four historical works, the author aims to examine the Iranian element of identity in the historical reports of the Qajar era.
ملخص الجهاز:
Representation of the Iranian Element in Historical Reports of the Qajar Era Mohsen Khalili* Assistant Professor of Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Received date: 1/5/87 - Approval date: 26/6/87) Abstract: History means the research into events that, in a specific period of time, have been counted, observed, and drawn to attention by researchers, and from which a narrative structure has been constructed.
The components of the Iranian builder of identity have been considered to be the Shah, homeland, nation, Iran, national culture, previous glories, royal sovereignty, attributes, character, deeds and the legitimacy of the king, the position of myth, the concept of borders, patriarchy, and the role of the masses of the people.
The king, when witnessing rebellion and insurrection, raises the flag of the state and commands royal punishment with the sword of Khosrow, not only so that the homeland and the lands of Iran may become prosperous and not decline, but because this is the same divine destiny and providence/kingship (ibid.
435, 89, 423, 12, 314, 40, 422, and 421) as symbols and manifestations of the long-standing tradition of kingship in Iran, and it is as if he considers the entire legitimacy of the Qajar kingship to be intertwined with them, to the extent that he calls his contemporary king, namely Nasir al-Din Shah, Khosrow Parviz (ibid.