چکیده:
ﻫﺪف ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ و ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺷﻴﻮهﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ درstudents having high and low emotional intelligence and داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان دارای ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ و ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ در ﻃﺒﻘﺎت اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲexamining emotional intelligence and coping styles in اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی ﺑﺎﻻ و ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻮد. روش ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﭘﺲروﻳﺪادی و ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞhigh and low socio-economical classes. For this reason, asample comprising 356 students in third grade of high 653 ﻧﻔﺮ از داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان ﺳﺎل ﺳﻮم دﺑﻴﺮﺳﺘﺎن ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮان اﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪschool in Tehran were selected using multi-step cluster روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﻴﺮی ﺧﻮﺷﻪای ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪای اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪﻧﺪ و ﺑﻪsampling. Participate in this study responded to ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﻴﻮهﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ راﺟﺮ و ﻧﺠﺎرﻳﺎن )5831(، ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪquestionnaire measuring coping styles (Roger andNajarian, 1993), personal characteristics and emotional 2004) ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎت ﻓﺮدی و ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮادﺑﺮی و ﮔﺮﻳﻮزintelligence (Bradberry, Griaves, 2004). One-way analysis ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ از ﮔﻨﺠﻲ، 4831( ﭘﺎﺳﺦ دادﻧﺪ. ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ وارﻳﺎﻧﺲof variance, Pearson correlation test, t student test, Tukey ﻳﻜﺮاﻫﻪ، ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺳﻮن، آزﻣﻮن ﻫﺎی ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺒﻲ ﺗﻮﻛﻲ و ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞposthon tests, and blocked analysis of variance were used.Results indicated that using rational and detached coping دادهﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ. ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎن دادt وارﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﻠﻮﻛﻲ و آزﻣﻮنstyles in students having high emotional intelligence is اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﻴﻮهﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ و اﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻲ در داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان دارایmore than students having low emotional intelligence. The ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ از داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان دارای ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦrate of using avoidance coping style in students having اﺳﺖ. ﻣﻴﺰان اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ اﺟﺘﻨﺎﺑﻲ در داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان دارایhigh and low emotional intelligence had no difference.The amount of using emotional coping style in students ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ و ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺗﻔﺎوﺗﻲ ﻧﺪاﺷﺖ. ﻣﻴﺰان اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﻴﻮهhaving low emotional intelligence was higher. The results .ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ در داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان دارای ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻮدalso indicated that emotional intelligence was higher in ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ در داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻻی اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮstudents a longing high socio-economical class than lowsoinseconomiced class. Using rational coping style in both از ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی و اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ درclasses made no difference. However using detached دو ﻃﺒﻘﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی ﺑﺎﻻ و ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺗﻔﺎوﺗﻲ ﻧﺪاﺷﺖ. اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ازcoping style was reported more in the higher class and ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ اﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻲ در ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻻ و اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ اﺟﺘﻨﺎﺑﻲ وusing avoidance and emotional coping style was reported ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ در ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻮد. ﻃﺒﻘﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی ﺑﺮ راﺑﻄﻪmore in the low class. It must be mentioned that socio-economical class had no significant effect on the relations ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ و ﺷﻴﻮه ﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ اﺛﺮ ﻧﺪاﺷﺖ. ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮی: درbetween emotional intelligence and coping style. ﻣﺠﻤﻮع ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮان ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﺑﺮون ﻓﺮدی ﻧﻈﻴﺮ وﺿﻌﻴﺖAdditionally, results of the present study indicated that اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی و ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ درون ﻓﺮدی ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ، ﺑﺮexternal factors such as socio-economical status andintrinsic factors like emotional intelligence influence of ﺷﻴﻮهﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻓﺮد اﺛﺮ ﮔﺬارﻧﺪ و اﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ و ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎهcoping styles and such variables have Closely elated to .اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮓ دارﻧﺪeach other and with socio-economical Staley.Key words: coping styles, emotional intelligence, socio-
خلاصه ماشینی:
"Journal of Applied Psychology ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ روان ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺎرﺑﺮدی 2009, Autumn, Vol. 3, No. 3(11), 48- 59 48-59 ،1388 ﺳﺎل3، ﺷﻤﺎره 3)11(، ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺷﻴﻮه ﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ای داﻧﺶ آﻣﻮزان دارای ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ و ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ در ﻃﺒﻘﺎت ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ– اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی Comparing coping styles between students with high and low emotional intelligence in different socio-economical classes A.
آزﻣﻮن ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ وارﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﻳﻚ راﻫﻪ اﺛﺮ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ در ﺷﻴﻮه ﻫﺎی ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ درﺟﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮع ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ F ﻣﻌﻨﺎداری ﻣﺠﺬورات آزادی ﻣﺠﺬورات ﻣﻨﺒﻊ 813/6594 2 763/2199 ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 100/0 269/711 ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ 610/24 353 907/13841 درون ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 553 643/44742 ﺟﻤﻊ 37/063 2 574/127 ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 100/0 66/22 اﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻲ 19/51 353 99/7165 درون ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 553 64/9336 ﺟﻤﻊ 38/951 2 66/913 ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 700/0 90/5 اﺟﺘﻨﺎﺑﻲ 04/13 353 71/5011 درون ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 553 38/40411 ﺟﻤﻊ 28/813 2 56/736 ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 100/0 717/6 ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ 64/74 353 30/65761 درون ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ 553 86/39371 ﺟﻤﻊ 35 آذر ﻧﺎدی، دﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺪاﭘﻨﺎﻫﻲ و ﺑﻬﺮام ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺻﺪق ﭘﻮر ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺟﺪول 1 ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﻛﻪ داﻧﺶ آﻣﻮزان دارای ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ از ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ )100/0< Pو 269/711= (Fو ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ اﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻲ )100/0 < pو 66/22= (Fﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ وارﻳﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﻠﻮﻛﻲ اﺛﺮ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ و ﻃﺒﻘﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ – اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی ﺑﺮ ﺷﻴﻮه ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ درﺟﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮع ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ F داری ﻣﺠﺬورات آزادی ﻣﺠﺬورات ﻣﻨﺒﻊ 940/0 778/3 931/762 2 872/435 ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ 509/86 764/5 027/673 ﺧﻄﺎ 511/0 523/3 269/922 2 529/954 ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ - اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی 361/96 793/5 292/373 ﺧﻄﺎ 931/0 647/1 153/67 4 304/503 ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻫﻮش ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ و ﻃﺒﻘﻪ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدی 277/34 643 176/72151 ﺧﻄﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ و ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﻴﺮی ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎی ﺳﺎﻟﻮوی و ﻫﻤﻜﺎران )0002، ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ازﻛﺎر، 4002(، راﺟﺮز و ﻫﻤﻜﺎران )6002(، ﺳﺎﻟﻮوی و ﻫﻤﻜﺎران )2002( ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ."