چکیده:
Naming as an inseparable sign of a country’s language has attracted the attention of many linguists to formulate and test hypotheses regarding the culture and language of the people of a certain area. Iran appears like a proper destination for conducting a research focusing on naming based on several factors such as geography or chronology. The present article aims to take a specific look at the impact of political era (sociopolitical factors) in addition to dialect over naming practices. Chronological data is gathered from 5 politically significant consecutive periods. Separately, 5 districts are chosen speaking 4 different native dialects to examine the second hypothesis regarding the influence of dialect on naming. 50 most popular names were collected on the two aforementioned different bases and analysis was conducted by SPSS software. The results revealed that time with concentration on political spans did not form an influential factor except for minor fluctuations. The other hypothesis regarding the factor of dialect is rejected for male names while females do confirm a limited consistency of dialect and name choice in most of the areas.
خلاصه ماشینی:
"1. Data Collection Geographically: The corpus was collected from the 5 major provinces of the main ethnic areas of Iran which happen to have different dialects: Fars (Persian), Kurdistan (Kurds), Azerbaijan Sharghi (Turks), Khuzestan (Arabs), Tehran (multicultural/capital).
The Hyper Categories for Name Types in Boys (B) &amp; Girls (G) <TD>Languages Etymological Implications </TD> <TD> Persian </TD> <TD> Arabic </TD> <TD> Western </TD> <TD> Kurdish &amp; Turkish </TD> <TD>Mythical</TD> <TD>B:</TD> <TD>G:/</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>Behavioral </TD> <TD>B: /</TD> <TD>G:/ </TD> <TD>B: / </TD> <TD>G:/ </TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: </TD> <TD>Natural</TD> <TD>B: /</TD> <TD>G:/</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G:/</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G:</TD> <TD>Religious</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: /</TD> <TD>G:/</TD> <TD>B:/</TD> <TD>G: /</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>Media/Literature</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: /</TD> <TD>B: ×</TD> <TD>G: ×</TD> Categorization was partly inspired by Khosravizadeh’s (2004, p.
Boys Names Frequency and Percentage in Different Political Periods (به تصویر این صفحه مراجعه فرمایید) Frequency of cells in terms of Turkish, Kurdish, Arabic Natural, Western Media/ literature were zero; consequently they were omitted from the table to obtain reliable results (see table (2)).
In terms of dialect and language, the data was collected synchronically in year 2012 (recent year) from 5 different provinces Fars (Persian), Kurdistan (Kurds), Azerbaijan Sharghi (Turks), Khuzestan (Arabs), Tehran (multicultural/capital) 4 of which represented various languages plus Tehran in which the standard language of the country is spoken."