چکیده:
Retrieval tasks provide learners with an opportunity to focus both on meaning and on form. There are four different retrieval directions. The present study aimed to identify the optimal direction of recall type retrievals during reading and to investigate the outcomes of each one. Forty-eight intermediate EFL learners took part in the study. One of the experimental groups was provided with the productive retrieval version of the reading text, and the other experimental group with the receptive retrieval version. A posttest was conducted in both productive and receptive directions for all the groups. Delayed posttests were administered two weeks after the treatment without prior notice to evaluate the time effect on participants' performance in each group. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in participants' performance in immediate and delayed posttests based on the method of retrieval. Further explanation of the effect of each retrieval direction on immediate and delayed posttests has been presented.
Retrieval tasks provide learners with an opportunity to focus both on meaning and on form. There are four different retrieval directions. The present study aimed to identify the optimal direction of recall type retrievals during reading and to investigate the outcomes of each one. Forty-eight intermediate EFL learners took part in the study. One of the experimental groups was provided with the productive retrieval version of the reading text, and the other experimental group with the receptive retrieval version. A Posttest was conducted in both productive and receptive directions for all the groups. Delayed posttests were administered two weeks after the treatment without prior notice to evaluate the time effect on participants' performance in each group. The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in participants' performance in immediate and delayed posttests based on the method of retrieval. Further explanation of the effect of each retrieval direction on immediate and delayed posttests has been presented.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Studying the Effect of Retrieval Direction during Reading on Productive and Receptive Knowledge of Vocabulary Sasan Baleghizadeh* Associate Professor, Shahid Beheshti University Samaneh Shafeie M.
The results showed that there was a statistically significant difference in participants' performance in immediate and delayed posttests based on the method of retrieval.
g. Liu, Rosburg, Gao, Weber & Guo, 2017; Toppino & Cohen, 2009).
Webb (2009), for example, investigated the efficacy of receptive and productive learning of words and the effect of it on five aspects of vocabulary knowledge.
In order to identify the optimal direction of retrieval during reading, the present study compared the effect of productive recall with receptive recall on students' performance in productive and receptive posttests.
The time effect between immediate and delayed posttests was investigated to show the extent to which second language learners are able to recall learned words via productive and receptive recalls.
(View the image of this page) Investigating Research Question 2 The second research question deals with the vocabulary learning scores of the participants in the immediate and the delayed posttests in both receptive and productive directions.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to deal with vocabulary retrieval in productive and receptive direction in the context of reading passage.
The results of this study revealed that participants who were provided with receptive retrieval opportunity during reading outperformed the control group in both immediate and delayed receptive posttests.
First, participants who retrieve productively during reading benefit from both productive and receptive learning in immediate posttest.