چکیده:
زمینه و هدف: تحول در تربیت مدرس برای دانشگاههای هزاره سوم وابسته به تربیت مدرس میان رشته ای می باشد. هدف تحقیق حاضر، ساخت و اعتباریابی مقیاس حکمت ادراک شده تربیت مدرس برای تدریس میان رشته ای است. روش شناسی: روش این پژوهش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی بوده است .جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل کلیه اساتید رشته های حوزه علوم تربیتی در سالهای 1400-1399 بوده است. بدلیل محدودیت جامعه آماری به شیوه سرشماری با تعداد 78 نفر بررسی انجام شد . ابزار جمع آوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه محقق ساخته حکمت ادراک شده تربیت مدرس برای تدریس میان رشته ای بود. برای برآورد روایی و پایایی از روش های همسانی درونی(آلفای کرونباخ و بازآزمایی) و روایی همزمان استفاده شد.یافته ها: در تحلیل عاملی اولیه، چهار عامل با ارزش ویژه بالاتر از یک بدست آمد و تحلیل عوامل بعدی با محدود شدن به این چهار عامل صورت گرفت. بر اساس محتوای ماده های مربوط، چهار عامل به این صورت نامگذاری شدند. «درک و فهم بسیط مفاهیم»، «تسلط بر روش های تحقیق بنیادی»،«فهم گسترش مزرهای رشته های علمی»، «زدایش تفکر تقلیل گرایی». همچنین این مقیاس از همسانی درونی مناسبی برخوردار بود(آلفای کرونباخ برابر 94/0 و پایایی بازآزمایی در فاصله دو هفته برابر 91/0).نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد، مقیاس ابعاد حکمت ادراک شده تربیت مدرس برای تدریس میان رشته ای از ساختار، روایی و پایایی مناسب برای جامعه ایرانی برخوردار است. این ابزار، مقیاس مناسبی برای هدف تحقیق که همانا تربیت مدرس برای تدریس چند رشته ای است، باشد.
So far, teacher training has been done for disciplines that have been a single discipline, such as history, literature, sociology, etc. However, with the passage of time and the more complex human society and, of course, the development of interdisciplinary disciplines, there is a need to train teachers who can teach their students with a more open and comprehensive mind to understand the content and concepts of the curriculum. Restricting students from further study to the principles and rules defined in the form of a discipline and discipline, and to teaching and research beyond the stereotypes and stereotypes that have been prevalent in each of the sciences itself over the past years. Investigate and study. Restricting the training of educators and teachers in the form of a discipline and discipline has led to differences of opinion and judgment on issues between researchers and educators in different fields of humanities, reaching a common understanding and understanding of the phenomena in The fields of humanities are important, it is always difficult between the actors of research and studies of humanities, it is difficult to provide understanding in the world of opinion and understanding for thinkers and thinkers of humanities and of course it is not possible to reach unity of opinion, mental biases, scattered thinking And the lack of convergence in thinking spread. Hence, the meaning of "interdisciplinary teacher training wisdom" is to pay attention to the implications that are necessary for the training of interdisciplinary teachers in the field of education and research for the higher education system. It is certain that wisdom is knowing things that are valuable and practice Enriches. Plato believed that theoretical wisdom or philosophy could not accept any division, and that all sciences were inferences from a single set of ultimate principles, and that the proof of these principles was the work of higher science, which Plato called dialectical (Ibn Sina, 2004). Philosophy means something, and practical wisdom is based on planning for action. Therefore, it is necessary to train an interdisciplinary teacher who discovered his wisdom. This research has been applied in terms of purpose and in terms of exploratory approach and in terms of method of collecting descriptive information of survey and cross-sectional type. The statistical population of this study included all professors in the field of educational sciences in Isfahan province in the years 1300-1400. Due to the limited statistical population, 78 people were studied by census method. 38% of the respondents were women and 62% of them were women. 38% of the respondents had 1 to 10 years of service, 34% of the respondents had 11 to 20 years of service and 28% of them had more than 20 years of service. After studying the theoretical foundations and research background and analyzing the content of the items obtained in relation to the perceived wisdom of Tarbiat Modares, the initial form of the questionnaire was prepared for multidisciplinary teaching. The initial form of the questionnaire was provided to 10 faculty members of the Department of Educational Sciences of Isfahan Universities. After removing similar and duplicate cases, 52 items were provided at first. Took. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha and retest) and simultaneous validity were used to ensure the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. It was used to analyze the data using SPSS software version 12. The questionnaire items were based on a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, almost agree, disagree, disagree). The minimum score of this questionnaire was 35 and the maximum score was 175. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to analyze the data. Exploratory factor analysis test was used to identify the number of common factors that affect a set of variables, determine the intensity of the relationship between each factor and each observed variable, and the large number of variables observed to a smaller number of Agents are summarized. Also determine the divergent validity and convergent validity of the reflective items classified in each factor. Then, confirmation factor analysis test was used to achieve the validity of the structures. In this regard, a factor matrix was formed to determine the factor load of each component or item with each factor. Factor load can be considered as correlation coefficients between factor and variable. Factor loads less than 0.3 can be ignored. Results: In the initial factor analysis, four factors with a specific value higher than one were obtained and the subsequent factor analysis was limited to these four factors. Based on the content of the relevant articles, four factors were named as follows. "Simple understanding of concepts", "Mastery of fundamental research methods", "Understanding the expansion of the fields of scientific disciplines", "Elimination of reductionist thinking". The scale also had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 and two-week retest reliability was 0.91). Based on the findings, it seems that in order to internalize interdisciplinary and holistic approaches in order to better and deeper the studied phenomena on the one hand and avoid scientific biases on the other hand, teachers should be trained in the teaching process. To be able to educate students with comprehensiveness in thinking and views that are not limited to a specific field and develop a rational mind to obtain analyzes, however logical and wise. It is in this case that the ground for change It offers a great deal in the field of higher education and the way of thinking.According to the research findings, one of the implications of teacher training wisdom for an interdisciplinary discipline is to provide a simple understanding of the concepts. According to studies (Khalili zadeh, 2018) and (etal.2020 Berasategi) interdisciplinary studies expand the understanding of concepts and this prevents semantic biases and fallacies. Research Results (Mehdi, 2013) Interdisciplinary studies lead to enrichment of thinking and more mindfulness to understand the needs and problems of society. Understanding concepts depends on a broader and more comprehensive understanding of the phenomena of the universe. It is in this state that the limits of the human point of view are broadened and go beyond the limitations that are based on the frameworks of the experimental sciences and are pre-formulated and predicted.Based on the findings, one of the implications of teacher training wisdom for an interdisciplinary discipline is mastering fundamental research methods. According to studies (Khanjarkhani, Bakhtiar Nasrabadi & Ebrahimi Dinani, 2009) interdisciplinary studies with the justification of the existential philosophy of the studied phenomena are looking for theories that form the basis of epistemology for all phenomena and using that theory The commonalities of phenomena can be understood based on the universe. As the understanding of the universe.
خلاصه ماشینی:
مسئله اصلي اين تحقيق عبارت است از اينکه ابعاد و مؤلفه هاي مقياس حکمت ادراکشده تربيت مدرس براي تدريس ميان رشته اي کدام اند و برازش مدل تدوين شده تحقيق چگونه است ؟ مباني نظري تربيت مدرس با رويکرد رشته اي به طور محض ، موجب آن شده است که مدرسان در رابطه تحليل موضوعات مورد تدريس به صورت محدود عمل کنند و صرفا ذهنيت دانشجويان خود را مبتني بر روش شناسي رشته اي که در آن تحصيل کرده اند، پرورش دهند.
نتايج مطالعه (٢٠١٠,Mohammadi Mehr and Fathi Vajargah) با عنوان « ارائه يک مدل الگوي تلفيق ميان رشته اي در طراحي برنامه هاي درسي » نشان داد، ز ويژگيهاي اين شيوه ميتوان به تقويت انتقال يادگيري اشاره کرد زيرا فراگيران فرصت مييابند تشابهات مفاهيم ، اصول و استراتژيها را بهتر از حالتي که رشته ها به صورت جدا تدريس ميشوند بياموزند و مفاهيم آموخته شده را در زمينه هاي مختلف به کارگيرند، همچنين به آن ها ميآموزد چگونه فکر کنند تصميم بگيرند، انديشه هاي خود را سازمان دهي کنند، مهارت هاي يادگيري، پژوهش ، جمع آوري و تجزيه وتحليل اطلاعات را به دست آورند و منجر به پرورش تفکر يادگيرندگان ميشوند.
ماتريس همبستگي چهار مؤلفه نظري مقياس و نمره کل آزمون {مراجعه شود به فایل جدول الحاقی} p>0/01 ** بر اساس جدول شماره ١ ، کليه عوامل با يکديگر در سطح ٠٠١ بيشترين رابطه معناداري بين عامل ٣ « فهم گسترش مرزهاي رشته هاي علمي » و عامل ٤ « زدايش تفکر تقليل گرايي»(٠٨٩=r) و کم ترين رابطه معناداري بين عامل ٢« تسلط بر روش هاي تحقيق بنيادي » و عامل ١« درک و فهم بسيط مفاهيم »(٠٦٥=r) بوده است .