چکیده:
The most important figure among Muslims is the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). In this regard, his biography has been discussed in many works. The popularity and greatness of the character of the Imam can be seen in literary texts, including the epistle of Ibn Hussam Khosafi. Before entering the main speech, the poet has dedicated verses to the representation of the life of the Imam, such as the representation of Ascension. This issue has also been considered by Western Islamologists. Anne-Marie Schimmel has spoken about the ascension of the Prophet and its quality based on the Qur'an and hadiths in several studies. In the present study, first Ibn Hussam Khosafi's view of Ascension has been studied with regard to Quranic verses and the views of Shiite commentators and then compared with Schimmel's views. The results of this research, which has been compiled based on library sources and descriptive-analytical method, show that both personalities emphasize the spiritual and physical dimensions of Ascension. Also, in their view, the process of ascension has had a celestial and heavenly nature. The difference between Khosafi and Schimmel's approach is that according to Shiite beliefs, the poet of KhavaranNameh excludes the view of the essence of God by the Prophet in the event of Ascension and limits it to seeing the divine attributes, but Schimmel is influenced by opinions. Sunni commentators and mere citations to some verses of the Qur'an, without flexibility, make it possible for Muhammad to see the essence of God and emphasize it.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Representation of the views of Ibn Husam Khosravi in Khawaran Nameh regarding the Mi'raj of the Prophet(s) and a comparison with the views of Annemarie Schimmel Zahra Beyrami 1 Date of receipt: 9 / 1400 / 16 2 Mohammad Hojjat Date of acceptance: 2 / 06 / 1401 Majid Hajizadeh 3 Abstract The most important figure among Muslims is Hazrat Muhammad(s).
The difference in approach between Khosravi and Schimmel is that the poet of Khawaran Nameh, based on Shia beliefs, negates the vision of the Essence of God by the Prophet(s) during the event of Mi'raj and limits it to the vision of Divine Attributes, whereas Schimmel, influenced by the views of Sunni commentators and by relying solely and inflexibly on certain Quranic verses, considers the vision of the Essence of God by Muhammad(s) possible and emphasizes it.
From the authors' perspective, Schimmel's views have greater alignment with the Islamic foundations of Mi'raj; because she considers this event a miracle and emphasizes its spiritual and physical nature and the vision of God by the Prophet (s) in the celestial realm.
(Savari, 1361: 64) In Ibn Husam's poetry, the experience of Mi'raj and the heavenly journey of the Prophet (s) is described as similar to Laylat al-Qadr; because just as on this important night, the Quran was revealed to the heart of His Presence and His awareness of divine sciences became complete, during the course of His Presence's spiritual journey in the heavens, many knowledges of the realm of Malakut were revealed to him.
(
, 
, 
)
