خلاصه ماشینی:
"The third approach which does not propose a precise judgment for or against the consistency between Islam and modernity is called the intellectual, religious movement in favor of transitions which was fulfilled by Islamic revolution of Iran under the leadership of Imam Khomeini.
On the other hand, with the victory of Islamic revolution and the emergence of Islamic republic in Iran, the religious schools underwent deep and wide changes in the light of new cultural and social atmospheres.
Presenting erroneous interpretations of religious concepts, advertizing consumer goods, lack of programs for introducing the enemies of the revolution, distorting the history of revolution, introducing different views on Islamic revolution, and broadcasting programs which endanger national unity are among the shortcomings with media which can make them an instrument for marring the structure of the Islamic evolution.
The answer to this question is that the Islamic revolution was mainly the result of a growth in Shiite religious sciences; and the presence of western modernism in Iran acted as a catalyst to the revolution.
In case of Islamic revolution of Iran, deep intellectual changes alongside other scientific and cultural efforts in religious schools specifically Hoze Elmie (theological school) in Qum, which happened simultaneous with the formation of Pahlavi government in Iran, formed the basic methods can be seen as well.
This logic aims at reinforcing the relationship between people and the new government through replacing arbitrary logics in the area of political commands with logics based on the revolutionary culture."