خلاصه ماشینی:
There are two points to consider: (1) The science of man is different from self knowledge as heldby Socrates and existentialists, and (2) which facets of the mankind is his reality?
Max Scheller believes that the mere variation in views does not lead to crisis, but overall agitation and disorder of thoughts have led to the current crisis in anthropology (The science of man) The crisis of contemporary anthropology are divided up as follows: 1.
Scientific anthropology which stems from three main controversies, (i) the adequacy of empirical method to study the mankind, (ii) the understanding of the internal life and human/ meaningful behaviour, and (iii) the methodology of evaluation of theories.
All Phenomena are studied in a rational, empirical, intuitive, or scripture-based method, and the science of man is no exception to the rule.
Another reason that prompts us not to accept objective anthropology as practiced in objective natural science is that of the difference between the nature of the mankind and the nature of other phenomena.
The most significant presupposition about The science of man in economics is that human beings are of rational behaviour, i,e.
To answer the first question, There are four theories as follows: (i) plato''''s view of the separation of soul and body.
This view is unable to justify the firm human character and soul-body relation.
Jalali-Tehrani: Human Evolution: An Islamic View Compared with Maslow''''s Theory.
Maslow regards the human evolution as self-actualization in which he tries to make a compromise between science and religion through an empirical method.