Özet:
Over the past three decades, Russia's foreign policy has had different ups and downs against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and despite the Islamic Republic of Iran's intentions of widespread and comprehensive relations in the regional, international and bilateral spheres; in practice, the Russian government has been in favor of these relations It has always been in the form of a cross-sectional, unsustainable case. Today, despite the unprecedented cooperation of the two countries in confronting the Syrian arrogance and the alignment of positions on some issues with regard to possible changes in the relations between Russia and the United States, as well as continuation of its pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran from the perspective of some thinkers in this area, There is no clear prospect of continuing this cooperation, and this concerns the future approach of Russia to the continuation of cooperation between the two countries.The purpose of this article is to understand whether the existing bilateral foreign-security cooperation represents a strategic alliance or simply a product of short-term political interests, a temporary tactical alliance to deal with specific threats? It seems that the approach of the brokers of the two countries is different, while Tehran's decision makers consider the relationship between the two countries to be a "strategic" alliance, but Moscow's decision makers consider it only in the "tactical" dimension.
Otomatik Özet:
This writing attempts to understand whether the existing cooperations in the foreign policies of the two countries indicate a strategic alliance or are simply the product of short-term political interests or a tactical alliance to confront specific threats?
Research Background In recent years, given the regional and global conditions and developments, Iran-Russia relations have gained increasing importance and have led to numerous studies regarding the nature and objectives of the relationship between the two countries.
Parker, in "Between Iran and Russia: A Space for Pursuing US Interests in Syria," while examining the cooperation between Iran and Russia in Syria, explains their conflicting interests and believes that Moscow's relations with other regional players have a more strategic nature than Moscow's relationship with Tehran; furthermore, in many cases, Moscow's policy is aligned with Washington.
Vladimir Sazhin considers a strategic relationship to include 7 characteristics: absence of serious conflicts in bilateral relations, existence of a high level of mutual trust, transparent relations, extensive economic and political cooperation, coordination in foreign policy decision-making, resistance to influence, and long-term relations (Sazhin, 2018).
Although today's Russian pragmatism has been closer to the Eurasianist school, while emphasizing a look toward the East and pursuing nationalist goals to revive the position of the Soviet Union; in order to acquire technology, it seeks to maintain and expand relations with the West because, considering the issue of the technological gap between Russia and the West, they know that in conditions where they want to maintain their power as an influential country at the international level, they cannot ignore the elements of economy and technology.
(
, 
, 
)
