خلاصة:
نتایج: نتایج تحلیل عاملی مقیاس ناسازواری در روابط عاشقانه، 6 عامل: توجه و ابراز علاقه ناکافی، حسادت یا خیانت، مسئولیتها و خرده وظایف خانه، رابطه جنسی، کنترل و تسلط دیگری، مسائل مالی و برنامههای آینده را به دست داد. اعتبار عوامل با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ (90/0 – 75/α=) برای خرده مقیاسها؛ (9/0-72/0) برای کل آزمون (82/0) بهدست آمد. همچنین برای بررسی روایی همگرا، همبستگی معناداری بین عوامل مقیاس ناسازواری در روابط عاشقانهبا پرسشنامه ارزیابی رابطه و روایی واگرا با پرسشنامه شادکامی بهدست آمد.
Introduction: Although Conflicts and disagreements are inevitable in interpersonal relationships, they have many impressions on the quality and consistency of a relationship. Clarifying the conflicts between the partners is a critical step of relationship assessment and a necessary factor in dissatisfaction intervention programs. The aim of the current study was to normalizing the Persian edition of the Reasons for Disagreement in Romantic Relationship Scale(RDRRS). Method: 285 male and female participants completed RDRRS, Relationship Assessment Scale(RAS), Relationship Quality Scale(RQS), Oxford Happiness Questionnaire(OHQ). The last three scales administered for assessing the validity of the RDRRS. To investigate the scale reliability, 30 of the participants completed the RDRRS again after two weeks. Data were analyzed, using the Pierson correlation method, and confirmative factor analysis. Results: The factor analysis of RDRRS revealed six main factors: Inadequate Attention or Affection; Jealousy & Infidelity; Chores & Responsibilities; Sex; Control & Dominance; Future Plans & Money. The reliability coefficients using Cronbach Alpha were equal to 0.75 to 0.90 for the main factors, 0.82 for the total score, and 0.39 for the test-retest sample. Discussion and conclusion : According to the acquired results, the Persian edition of RDRRS has a factorial structure the same as the original scale. The Persian edition of RDRRS is a suitable scale for investigating disagreements among Iranian couples.