چکیده:
In the initial models of economic growth, economic factors entered in to models but in the following models, non-economic factors entered in to models. Many broad studies were done on this subject by the economists, and already considerable results were obtained. Subjects such as corruption in the administrative bodies were new variables entering the literature of economic growth at that stage. In this area, we studied the impact of administrative corruption on the economic growth of ECO member countries and OPEC member countries. The paper presents a comparative study on oil producing developing countries and non-oil producing developing countries for the period of2003-2008. All ECO member countries with the exception of Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan and also OPEC member countries are included in this study . The results of research based on Panel data approach indicate a reverse and significant relation effect between administrative corruption and economic growth of ECO member countries and OPEC member countries.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In this area, we studied the impact of administrative corruption on the economic growth of ECO member countries and OPEC member countries.
The results of research based on Panel data approach indicate a reverse and significant relation effect between administrative corruption and economic growth of ECO member countries and OPEC member countries.
- Assuming other conditions are fixed, corruption at high level is convergent with low allocation of sources to supply operational costs and maintaining basic Some of the researchers including Lin and Nedman (2002), Vicente (2009) and Aslhsen (2007) came to the conclusion that the countries which have a high rate of oil and mineral materials, there are more corruption and economic growth is less and the reason is the quality of their democratic institutions (Holder, 2009).
Based on this model, the impact of administrative corruption on the economic growth was fitted and then the proper model was estimated in form of the following linear regression: RESULTS AND DISSCUSSION Using table 3, it is observed that t-statistics of corruption is (3.
So, the hypothesis H0 that indicates the lack of relation between administrative corruption and economic growth at the confidence level of 95% is rejected.
Then, presenting some models, and based on panel data approach, it will study the effect of administrative corruption on economic growth of ECO member countries and OPEC member countries within last five years (2003-2008).
Furthermore, there is a direct and significant relation between capital assets and work forces of OPEC member countries and ECO member countries with their economic growth.