چکیده:
In spite of the challenges, and if the resistance econometric model is formed based on capacity
internal, will be the launch pad for post-challenge. Taxes as a major source of government revenue
based on internal capacity, the strength of the economy plays an important role. This study examines the impact of policies issued by the leader of the resistance economy's level of tax compliance. Research time period 2010 - 2013 . The research in nature and method was descriptive and in terms of the purpose is the application .Methods of collecting data in this research library. To collect data in this study, the information contained in the financial statements of companies surveyed is essential. The results showed that, in other words the level of tax compliance increased
خلاصه ماشینی:
2015 Accepted 19 Aug. 2015 Published 30 Sep. 2015 Keywords: resistive economic policies, resistance economy, tax compliance researchers show that there is a significant differenceINTRODUCTION Whatever is clearly seen in economics of Iran are policies of monetary economic, finance, exchange, banking, engagement and production without coherent and defined communication; and sometimes are used in case after developing the challenges and because there is no systematic relation between them, they compensation each other and totally they have no needful efficiency(Basu,1997).
Hypotheses of the research Main hypothesis: resistive economic policies have significance impact on tax condescension.
05, so the H0hypothesis in confidence level of 95% is rejected and then could conclude that there is a significance difference between proportions of on the head files to investigation from production companies, before and after the declaration of resistive economic policies.
05, so the H0hypothesis in confidence level of 95% is rejected and could conclude that there is a significance difference between tax gap in production companies before and after declaration of resistive economic policies.
So level of tax condescension in production companies are increased after declaration of resistive economic policies.
In first and second incidental hypotheses, impact of declaration the resistive economic policies on level of tax condescension in production companies are tested.
In third and fourth incidental hypotheses, impact of declaration the resistive economic policies by supreme leader on level of tax condescension in trade companies are tested.
So according to the obtained results, it is suggested for investors to consider this issue that resistive economic policies are effective on level of tax condescension of taxpayers.