چکیده:
Today, knowledge is seen as the only assuring source of a competitive constant merit for organizations. Organizations have realized that their knowledge of methods for accomplishing tasks and of providing services is an important asset to be managed like their other valuable assets. In other words, organizational knowledge is a value-producing resource (for the beneficiaries) and an instrument in producing a product and in providing innovative services to attain and retain competitive constant merit. Before exercising knowledge management, vast studies on the field seem necessary. In doing so, this research has been done with the purpose of evaluating the possibility of establishing the knowledge management in State Welfare Organization of Iran (SWOI). For this study, descriptive research method was used for gathering data. In doing so, 208 managers and experts from SWOI were selected using stratified random sampling method; and, they answered 80 question questionnaire. This instrument was developed based on research literature and by the researcher. Its Content Validity has been approved by the experts. The Reliability (Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha) of all the factors was more than 0.7 which is in an acceptable limit. After performing Shapiro and Wilk test and after being sure that data are normally distributed, results from data analysis using One Sample t Test showed that from 7 factors of Bukowitz and Williams knowledge management model, conditions of 6 factors (finding, use, learning, evaluation, development /maintenance, and the removal of the knowledge) of the research hypotheses are not acceptable and only knowledge sharing and exchanging calculated average, 3.18, is above the average line. Moreover, there is no significant difference, (p>0.05), observed among subjectsʼ averages based on cognitive factors of sex, position, etc. But there is a significant difference, (P<0.05), in education level variable in indices of knowledge finding, knowledge learning, and removal of knowledge. Effect size index, too, shows that the biggest difference is related to subscale of removal of knowledge. Finally, we can evaluate conditions of processes necessary for establishing knowledge management in Iran as not acceptable which makes it as a necessity for those in charge to pay attention to it. At the end of the research, applied suggestions are provided too.
خلاصه ماشینی:
After performing Shapiro and Wilk test and after being sure that data are normally distributed, results from data analysis using One Sample t Test showed that from 7 factors of Bukowitz and Williams knowledge management model, conditions of 6 factors (finding, use, learning, evaluation, development /maintenance, and the removal of the knowledge) of the research hypotheses are not acceptable and only knowledge sharing and exchanging calculated average, 3.
(2010) concluded, too, that in six considered elements (knowledge identification, acquisition, development, sharing and distribution, exploitation, and storage) necessary infrastructures is less than average level for establishing knowledge management in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
The results showed that evaluation of managers regarding application of all the knowledge management elements, namely 7 elements of knowledge acquisition and application, learning from experiences, knowledge sharing and exchanging, knowledge measurement, knowledge stabilization, and optimal use of knowledge, was not significant and application of all the elements was not on an acceptable level (Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology) The Research method Since the purpose of the present research is to determine the conditions of processes required for establishing knowledge management in SWOI, a questionnaire consisting of 80 questions has been used, Based on seven factors in Bukowits and Williams knowledge management process model.
Table (3) summary of findings from between subject effect test in average of subscales of Bukowitz and Williams knowledge management model scale for three groups of education variable 3rd type of sum of squares Degree of independence F ratio Significance level Effect size Knowledge acquisition 2.