چکیده:
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی رابطه میان انواع بازخورد ،یادگیری خودتنظیمی و پیشرفت نگارش انجام شد. بدین منظور، از طرح تحقیق شبه تجربی استفاده شد که در آن سه گروه آزمایشی برای هر یک از سه نوع بازخورد و یک گروه گواه در نظر گرفته شد. تعداد 30 فراگیر زبان در هر یک از گروهها حاضر بودند و پرسشنامه ارزیابی خودتنظیمی آکادمیک را در پیشآزمون و پسآزمون تکمیل کردند و نگارش آنها پیش و بعد از دریافت آموزش ارزیابی شد. نتایج آماری نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین توانایی خودتنظیمی چهار گروه با توجه به نوع بازخورد دریافتی وجود ندارد. علاوه بر این، نتایج آزمون t زوجی نشان داد که تفاوت آماری معناداری بین توانایی خودتنظیمی چهار گروه در پیشآزمون و پسآزمون وجود ندارد. نتایج آماری رابطهی ضعیف و مثبتی را بین توانایی یادگیری خودتنظیمی و پیشرفت نگارش از طریق دریافت بازخورد معلمان نشان داد. در مقابل، رابطهی ضعیف و معکوسی بین توانایی خودتنظیمی و پیشرفت نگارش از طریق بازخورد همسالان، مبتنی بر رایانه و بدون بازخورد مشاهده شد.
This study intended to investigate the relationship among feedback types, self-regulated learning, and writing achievement. To this end, a type of the non-randomized control group pre-test post-test design, was applied, where three experimental groups, for the three types of feedback as treatments, and a control group were postulated, each including about 30 Iranian EFL students, who were pre-post tested through the Academic Self-Regulated Learning Scale (ASRL-S) questionnaire, and whose writings were inter-rated both before and after the treatments. The results of the one-way between-groups ANOVA indicated a statistically insignificant difference between the self-regulatory ability of the four groups with respect to the type of feedback they received. Moreover, the results of paired samples t-test showed a statistically insignificant difference in all the four within-group self-regulatory abilities from pretest to posttest. Furthermore, the results of Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient indicated a small positive correlation between self-regulatory learning and writing achievement with teacher feedback; however, small negative correlations were revealed between self-regulatory learning and writing achievement with peer, computer-assisted, and no feedback.
خلاصه ماشینی:
درنتیجـه ، بـا در نظـر گرفتن پژوهش های محدودی که در این زمینه صورت گرفتـه اسـت ، ضـرورت مطالعـه تـأثیر انواع بازخورد، از قبیل بازخورد همسالان، معلمان و مبتنی بر رایانـه بـرای شـفافسـازی بهتـر روشهای ارائه بازخورد به فراگیران در راستای ارتقای سطح خـودتنظیمی و مهـارت نگـارش مشهود است .
Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?
The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing.
Self-regulated Learning and the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Norwegian Teacher Education.
STOP and DARE: Self-regulated strategy development for persuasive writing with elementary students with E/BD in a residential facility.
The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority and majority language students.
New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes.
Promoting self- regulated learning in Iranian postgrad’s English writing classes using an automated essay scoring software.
Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms.
Feedback on second language students writing.
Self-regulated learning in education majors.
A Study of Consciousness-Raising by Computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback on second language learning.
V. (1990) Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners acquisition of articles.
H. Schunk (Eds) Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp.
Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies.