چکیده:
امروزه در حوزه آموزش عالی دستیابی به مزیت رقابتی و تمایز، بیش از پیش اهمیت یافته است. یک ابزار کارآمد جهت دستیابی به مزیت رقابتی و ایجاد تمایز ایجاد شخصیتی مطلوب برای برند است. در این پژوهش بهمنظور بررسی شخصیت برند از مفهوم آرکئوتایپها استفاده شده است. هدف از انجام این پژوهش تعیین ادراک از شخصیت برند دانشگاه یزد از طریق رویکرد آرکئوتایپی و پرتکرارترین آرکئوتایپ انتخابی هر تیپ شخصیتی و همچنین بررسی ارتباط میان شخصیت دانشجویان و اساتید دانشگاه یزد و آرکئوتایپی که بیشترین میزان انتخاب را دارد، میباشد. به علاوه هدف دیگر از انجام این پژوهش درک یکسان بودن یا نبودن آرکئوتایپ انتخابی هر پنج تیپ شخصیتی میباشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را دانشجویان و اساتید دانشگاه یزد تشکیل میدهند. دادههای لازم در این پژوهش به کمک 118 پرسشنامه تکمیلشده توسط دانشجویان و اساتید در دانشکدهها و مقاطع تحصیلی مختلف که بر اساس نمونهگیری تصادفی انتخابشدهاند، جمعآوریشده است. لازم به ذکر است که این پژوهش با کاربست رویکرد شخصیت نئو و مدل آرکئوتایپی مارک و پیرسون صورت گرفته است. در تجزیهوتحلیل دادهها از جدول توافقی و ضریب کرامر استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان میدهد که بیشرین آرکئوتایپهای انتخابی آرکئوتایپهای بیگناه، حاکم، جستوجوگر و جادوگر میباشند. همچنین با تجزیه و تحلیل ویژگیهای شخصیتی افراد با استفاده از رویکرد نئو و آرکئوتایپ انتخابی توسط آنان مشخص گردید که افراد با ویژگیهای شخصیتی متفاوت در انتخاب برترین آرکئوتایپ انتخابی یعنی آرکئوتایپ بیگناه برای شخصیت برند دانشگاه یزد اتفاق نظر دارند و هر پنج تیپ شخصیتی این گزینه را بیش از سایرین انتخاب نمودهاند. انتخاب این آرکئوتایپ رابطه ای با ویژگیهای روانرنجورخویی، وظیفه شناسی، برونگرایی و توافقپذیری ندارد و تنها ارتباط این آرکئوتایپ با ویژگی تجربهپذیری مورد تایید قرار گرفت.
Introduction: In the past, marketing was used only in business and had no role in education. The role of educational institutions was to serve the community, conduct research activities and teach students the skills that were useful to them in the workplace. In fact, these institutions were only used to develop knowledge. But now, marketing departments have found a special position in the organizational structure of higher education institutions. Higher education managers consider marketing activities as important as the financial, human resources, quality assurance and the other internal departments of these institutions. The reasons for the importance of marketing in higher education centers is the increased competition between universities over attracting students and professors and obtaining financial support. The decline in government financial support, along with the declining trend in university admissions, is putting additional pressure on higher education institutions. In recent decades, the term branding has been used in the higher education marketing literature. In these complex and highly competitive markets, universities and other higher education institutions consider branding as a way to resist the challenges. Brand is one of the most valuable assets of any organization whose appropriate management can pave the way to success in any organization. Therefore, it seems necessary to pay attention to the issue of branding in the universities in order to achieve a competitive advantage. Brand is one of the most important factors that improve the competitive position of universities. The ideal brand of a university encourages decision makers to continue their studies to choose that university; thus becoming confident that they will receive advantages such as high-quality education, suitable physical facilities and suitable job market opportunities. Because universities are an effective instrument for providing education for applicants, it seems necessary for these institutions to have the social credibility and a proper mental image. Having a proper mental image of a university brand attracts students and professors and gains access to foreign resources to invest in the university. As a key factor, it persuades students to choose that university by students. Therefore, for effective brand management, consumers' mental image of the brand and their inference and perception of brand personality must be understood. So, if the personality perceived by the consumer fits the identity that universities are trying to present, the factors creating this fit should be strengthened. Also, if there is a discrepancy, the factors causing it should be detected and corrected. The purpose of this study is to determine the perception of the brand personality of Yazd University through the archetypal approach and the most frequent archetype of each personality type. The study also seeks to investigate the relationship between the personality of students and professors of Yazd University and the archetype that is the most selected. Another purpose of this study is to understand whether the selected archetypes of all the five personality types are the same or not.Methodology: The present study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive analysis in terms of method.. Secondary sources and libraries were used to collect the data on the background of the research. Preliminarily, the data were collected using a questionnaire appropriate to the research topic. The students and professors of Yazd University formed the statistical population of the research. The necessary data for the study were collected from 118 questionnaires completed by the students and professors in different faculties and educational grades. They were selected through random sampling. Statistical analysis was performed using the contingency table and Cramer's V.Results and Discussion: The results show that the selected archetypal personalities for Yazd University brand are innocent, ruler, explorer and magician archetypes, Also, by the analysis of the personality traits of individuals using the neo-approach and the archetype of their choice, it was found that people with different personality traits agree in choosing the most selective archetype, i.e., the innocent archetype for the brand personality of Yazd University. All the five personality types chose this option more than the others. The choice of this archetype had nothing to do with the characteristics of neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, and agreement, and only the association of this archetype with the characteristic of empiricism was confirmed.Conclusion: It is better for the personality of a brand to be clear and tangible so that the majority can have the same perception of the personality of that brand. The results of this study show that this happened correctly about the brand of Yazd University. The results confirm that people, regardless of their personality traits and types, choose the same archetypes for the Yazd University brand, and people with five different personality traits are significantly unanimous in their choice of archetypes. In general, all the five personality types considered innocent archetypes as their first choice for this brand. The three personality types with the characteristics of neuroticism, openness to experience and agreeableness, in addition to agreeing on the first chosen archetype, did the same in the second choice, namely the choice of the ruling archetype. From these results, it can be deduced that the brand of Yazd University has an intimate and reliable personality that seeks happiness and focuses on independence. The brand seeks to change and improve the world. It avoids illiteracy, disability and inefficiency. This brand can also help people find the way to what they can be, recognize their inherent potential, and put it to practice. This brand does not accept inertia and monotony and seeks change in life and tries to help achieve its goals by turning threats into opportunities. It is not only a successful brand, but it can be considered as a leader in its field, looking for new services and methods.
خلاصه ماشینی:
هدف از انجام اين پژوهش تعيين ادراک از شخصيت برند دانشگاه يزد از طريق رويکرد آرکئوتايپي و پرتکرارترين آرکئوتايپ انتخابي هر تيپ شخصيتي و همچنين بررسي ارتباط ميان شخصيت دانشجويان و اساتيد دانشگاه يزد و آرکئوتايپي که بيشترين ميزان انتخاب را دارد، ميباشد.
همچنين با تجزيه و تحليل ويژگيهاي شخصيتي افراد با استفاده از رويکرد نئو و آرکئوتايپ انتخابي توسط آنان مشخص گرديد که افراد با ويژگيهاي شخصيتي متفاوت در انتخاب برترين آرکئوتايپ انتخابي يعني آرکئوتايپ بيگناه براي شخصيت برند دانشگاه يزد اتفاق نظر دارند و هر پنج تيپ شخصيتي اين گزينه را بيش از سايرين انتخاب نموده اند.
در اين بازارهاي پيچيده و بسيار رقابتي، دانشگاه ها و ساير مؤسسات آموزش عالي برند سازي را به عنوان راهکاري جهت مقابله با چالش ها قلمداد ميکنند و به اهميت جذب دانشجويان و داشتن برند متمايز در بازار رقابتي پي برده اند و به همين دليل اين موضوع بيش ازپيش مورد توجه دانشگاه و مراکز آموزش عالي قرار گرفته است به طوريکه افزايش رقابت ميان دانشگاه ها بر سر جذب دانشجو آن ها را وادار ميسازد از طريق ايجاد مجموعه اي از ويژگيهاي مطلوب و منحصربه فرد براي 1.
Identifying the components affecting the brand of Islamic Azad University using fuzzy Delphi technique, journal of education system , 251-238.
Investigating the effective factors on creating brand equity in higher education )case study of Payame Noor University(.
Study on Chinese brand cultural archetype: theory building and cross cultural comparison, journal of contemporary marketing science,vol)3(, no1,pp 57-80.
"Exploring Brand Personality through Archetypes.