خلاصه ماشینی:
What we have, instead, is a discussion by various writers- philosophers, theologians, jurisprudents, sufis and political and economic theorists—-in their particular fields of some issues that are either part of, or relevant to, Islamic ethics.
Theologians have, indeed, discussed some very important questions of Islamic ethics, such as the source of ethical knowledge, the meaning of ethical terms, and the basis of moral obligation.
The second task before Islamic ethics is to discuss the general terms used in Islamic morals, such as good, bad, right, wrong, meritorious, non- meritorious, responsibility, and obligation.
The distinction between the right and the meritorious, the role of motive, the concept of good and its levels, the nature and scope of virtue-wall these notions are influenced by the Islamic idea of God, the life Hereafter, prophecy, and revelation.
790/1388) in al Muwéfaqiit, to mention a few leading scholars, have raised the question: what is the end or the object of the Shari ‘ah?’-l Al Shatibi, who has studied the works of the earlier two writers and discusses the issue at length, gives the following answer: “The rules of the shar’ have been designed to produce goods (masfzlih) and remove evils, (mafizsid) and these are certainly their ends and objects?“ And “the masfilih are those which promote the preservation and fulfillment of human life, and the realization "Ibn Taymiyah, Minhéj al Sunnah, (Beirut: Dar al Kutub a1 Islamiyah, n.