خلاصه ماشینی:
Views and Comments A Critique of Islamization of the Sciences: Its Philosophy and Methodology Aliyu Usman Tilde I agree that all efforts should be made to deprive Science as much as possible of its present materialistic philosophy because we Muslims today are only dragged into sharing the evils of the struggle between Science and Religion which took place in Europe and in which we never participated.
What I consider as important here to clarify are two respective characteristics of science and Islam which makes it impossible or not even advisable to forge a tight relationship between the two.
If the “truth” in science means empirical observation and scientific theory means a logic based on demonstrated and verified observa- tions then the whole Western world before the discoveries of the telescope 2It should be noted that most contemporary theories are not arrived at from verified observations but from inferences derived from non-observable supposed occurrences.
“Truth” in Revelation is Firm Truth in science changes, as we have seen above, owing to the shortcom- lugs and weaknesses of man.
Our understanding of any verse largely depends on the level of our knowledge of physical and natural sciences as well as scientific technique.
This is a wrong opinion because it means that if there is a conflict between science and religion on a particular issue, -‘In Sayyid Qutb, Khasais al Tasawwur al Islam?
I do not at all agree that we separate science from Islam as it is practiced today in the world.