خلاصة:
The present writing analyzes and classifies the six types of feminist theories presented in law. In the first section, ideological feminism or the conflict between egalitarian feminism and difference feminism is addressed. The second section is dedicated to radical feminism which, by relying on the oppressive power relationship of men and the subordination and compliance of women in the issue of gender, practically arises in the purgatory between ideological feminism and identity feminism—namely anti-racist, relational, and postmodern feminisms—all of which present themselves as transcending gender difference as an intellectual basis in feminist theories.
ملخص الجهاز:
The second section is dedicated to radical feminism which, by relying on the oppressive power relationship of men and the subordination and compliance of women regarding the issue of gender, practically stands in the limbo between ideological feminism and identity feminism—namely, anti-racist, relational, and postmodern feminisms—all of which devote themselves to moving beyond gender difference as an intellectual foundation in feminist theories.
Subordination and compliance, ideological, sameness, difference, radical, identity, postmodern (1)- Daloz Civil Law Quarterly, Issue 1, Winter 2001 (2)- Canada-Professor at Laval University Faculty of Law, Quebec "Marie-Claire BELLEAU" (3)- PhD student in Private Law, Sorbonne University-France Introduction: The prominent aspect and main characteristic of feminist legal analysis is that it distinguishes itself through a diverse and varied set of principles, approaches, and different solutions.
From this viewpoint, the way to achieve equality between the male and female genders is either to extend and generalize men's rights to women (egalitarian feminism), or to humanize the legal system by introducing and incorporating so-called feminine ideas into it (difference feminism).
Wendy Williams, in an article titled "The Crisis of Equality: Reflections on Culture, Courts, and Feminism," which was published in English in 1982,34 criticizes American law because, in her view, the law of this country acts from the standpoint of difference theory in issues that directly relate to the sexual organization of social roles between men and women.
(
, 
, 
)
