ملخص الجهاز:
Dependent Authoritarian-Bureaucratic State: Modeling the Shah's Regime (1953-1979) MOHAMMAD ALI MOUSAVI 1 Abstract: This paper has argued that in the case of a semi-peripheral country, where the state is centralized and enjoys autonomy from social pressures, a partial application of three theories - the capitalist interpretation of the nature of the state, namely the Weberian-Hintzian approach; the world-system theory; and the dependency paradigm - is necessary to help us understand the state, its structure, its capacity, and its position in the capitalist world economy.
The major theoretical contribution of this study has been to bring about a synthesis of perspectives - derived from the above mentioned theories - namely dependent development, semi periphery, and authoritarian-bureaucratic structure - and two concepts: autonomy, and interdependence.
· • The concept ofdependent development Dependent development refers to cases: "where capital accumulation and diversified industrialization of a more than superficial sort are not 'only occurring in a peripheral country, but are dominating the transformation of its'economy and social structure" (Evans 1979: 32).
As a semiperipheral state with a high degree of autonomy, the Iranian state was, in the 1960s and 1970s, able to move its dependent client patron relationship with the capitalist developed countries to an interdependent relation, in which it could bargain with the core countries (ie.
As a result of the control of an internally independent, but externally dependent variable of oil revenues, the state is able to pursue the process of rapid industrialization and economic · development.