خلاصه ماشینی:
"In that sense, this paper discusses how the structurally very deep relationship between peace, religion, and the project of equality in diversity promoted within international law by the UDHR is sidelined by the general project of "global governance," to which "human security" has contributed a legitimate basis for disregarding the sovereignty on which human rights depend.
4 This paper engages the idea of human security from the perspective of international law, and tries thereby to highlight two elements of “human security” as a discourse: its political nature and its stabilizing position in the protean political discourse of global governance.
This paper, while feeding on existing critical discussions of human security thinking, suggests that the discourse of human security reveals specific normative depth in contact with an international legal perspective and that, conversely, “human security” sheds a particular light on the properly political nature of human rights.
Political theology: Political Monotheism of International Human Rights The larger conceptual universe of “human security” is that of the political discourse of global governance, in which human security finds a place next to R2P, but also for instance sustainable development.
In a way, the Universal Declaration could then be reconstructed as the international version of the logic of many State constitutions, where the limits to the power of State organs are sanctioned by the monitoring activity of judicial (although sometimes also executive or legislative) institutions in charge of so-called constitutional (or judicial) review against a charter of fundamental rights – – here the political process of intergovernmental relations is used for the purposes of having States remind one another of the basic idea that the dignity of human beings marks the boundary of State power."