چکیده:
در دو سال اخیر روندی در حقوق بینالملل قوام یافته که بر تفسیر صحیح قطعنامههای شورای امنیت تأکید دارد. نوع تفسیر قطعنامهها تأثیر شگرفی بر اجرای آنها میگذارد. در پرونده هستهای ایران شورای امنیت تعدادی قطعنامه علیه برنامه هستهای تصویب کرد؛ دولتهای غربی با سوءتفسیر و بعضاً تفسیر غلط، اقدامات فراقطعنامهای و تحریمهایی یکجانبه علیه ایران اتخاذ نمودند. در صورت اِعمال تفسیر صحیح قطعنامههای شورای امنیت، چنین اقداماتی در حقوق بینالملل محلی از اِعراب نداشته و روندی مناسب و درست برای تفسیر و اجرای قطعنامههای آتی شورا ایجاد مینماید.
In recent two years, a procedure has taken place in international law that emphasizes on correct interpretation of Security Council resolutions. The interpretation of the resolutions has a huge impact on their implementation. In Iran nuclear issue, the Security Council adopted number of resolutions against Iran’s nuclear program. Based on misinterpretations, western governments imposed unilateral sanctions against Iran and have gone beyond Security Council resolutions. With correct interpretation of Security Council resolutions, these measures and misinterpretations can’t be accepted in international law and appropriate procedure would be taken place in future.
خلاصه ماشینی:
UN Security Council, Security Council Resolution 1929 (2010) [on measures against Iran in connection with its enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development], June 9, 2010, S/RES/1929 (2010), introductory paragraph.
“Fact Sheet on the New UN Security Council Sanctions on Iran,” The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, June 09, 2010, https://www.
Imposition of Sanctions with Respect to the Energy, Shipping, and Shipbuilding Sectors of Iran, (a) Findings, paras 5-6,” Office of the Law Revision Counsel, United States Code, Last Accessed May, 2016, http://uscode.
Volkmar Götz, Peter Selmer, and Rüdiger Wolfrum (Berlin: Springer 1998), 87; Michael Wood, “The Interpretation of Security Council Resolutions,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 20(1) (1998): 73; Paul Szasz, “The Security Council Starts Legislating,” American Journal of International Law 96 (2002): 901.
See: Justin Gruenberg, “An Analysis of United Nations Security Council Resolutions: Are All Countries Treated Equally?,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 41 (2009): 469, 487-490.
“Security Council Imposes Additional Sanctions on Iran, Voting 12 in Favour to 2 against, with 1 Abstention,” Security Council, United Nations, June 9, 2010, SC/ 9948; https://www.
Amir Hossein Ranjbarian, Abdollah Abedini and Khalil Rouzegari, “Interpreting the United Nations Security Council Resolutions by the Domestic Courts: The Judgment of the High Court of Singapore on the Iranian Nuclear Program,” Journal of East Asia and International Law 409 (2014): 420.
gov/the-press- office/fact-sheet-new-un-security-council-sanctions-iran.
gov/the-press- office/fact-sheet-new-un-security-council-sanctions-iran.