چکیده:
Due to the ambiguities regarding the perception of transactions of commercial and civil companies, this article attempts to determine and clarify the scope of transactions of the aforementioned companies. Therefore: Firstly - it has seemed that - considering some exceptions - performing the transactions mentioned in paragraph 4 of Article 3 of the Commercial Code by commercial companies is not unlimited. Secondly - regarding the commercial transactions of civil companies and the reflection of the provisions of general partnership companies on these types of companies, we have concluded that a civil company, in any way and from any aspect, does not acquire the nature of a commercial company under Article 220 of the Commercial Code. Thirdly - we have tried that the legislator's uncertainty in establishing the guarantee of enforcement of unregistered commercial companies has caused doubt and instability in recognizing and differentiating commercial companies from civil companies.
خلاصه ماشینی:
In response to this question, it should be said that: Firstly, according to Article 4 of the Commercial Code, which stipulates that “transactions involving real estate are excluded from the scope of transactional authority of “companies mentioned in paragraphs 2 to 7 of Article 20 of the Commercial Code,” but at the same time, it cannot be argued that these companies have no other limitations for carrying out other civil transactions, because if the companies in question engage in transactions that, according to commercial practice, fall outside the scope of commercial law, such transactions of the aforementioned commercial companies cannot be considered commercial, such as when a limited liability company engages in mining operations, or cultivates and harvests agricultural products, or engages in gardening.
Because, if the legislator had a different intention and viewed the possibility of carrying out civil transactions by joint stock companies and other companies mentioned in Article 20 of the Commercial Code with a single perspective, and its intention in drafting Article 2 of the “Amendment Law of 1967” was merely to authorize the performance of real estate transactions by public and private joint stock companies, it would have phrased it as follows: “A joint stock company is considered a commercial company, even if the subject of its operations is the performance of real estate transactions.