چکیده:
Among Islamic sects There are two groups that disagree about the issue of Bada`: Imamiyeh or Shiites، from one hand considers Bada` as one of the original principles of Islamic beliefs and In order to prove this believe they have proposed four reasons، among which the most important is the deletion and notation verse (Mahv va Esbat) in Quran. On the other hand، Sunni''s scholars are strongly against the issue of Bada` and believe that one of its implications and consequences is acceptance of God''s knowledge after his ignorance، while this is not admissible about God. The lexical meaning of Bada` is emersion after hiding; but Imamiyeh does not intend such a meaning. The meaning that they educe from the word Bada`، is “the change in people`s life path via their actions” and all scholars (Shiites and Sunnie) accept this fact. Therefore this conflict is indeed a lexical dispute، rather than a semantic. because، the fact which here is denieded، is not actually believed in، and what is believed in، has not been denied.
خلاصه ماشینی:
Theologians often say that attributing Bada’ in this sense to the Essence of God is disbelief, and on the other hand, such things have been seen in the Sharia, therefore they have thought about justifying and interpreting it regarding God and said: Bada’ regarding the Essence of God means that servants imagine a matter and a ruling in a way that is different from what is in the Preserved Tablet, and because what is recorded in the Preserved Tablet is hidden from hidden from the servants, therefore they do not pay attention to it and see the opposite in the Tablet of Erasure and Confirmation or in the world of destiny, and when what is recorded in the Preserved Tablet becomes clear to them and what is contrary to what they think is revealed, they assume that Bada’ has occurred (Raghib, 1427 AH, p.
2. Fakhr al-Razi He says in the commentary of verse 39 of Surah Ar-Ra’d: The Shia believe that Bada’ is permissible for God, and the truth of Bada’ for them is that a person believes in something, then it becomes clear that reality is contrary to his belief, and to prove this matter, they cling to the verse “God erases and establishes” (Ar-Ra’d: 38-39), then he adds that this belief is false, because God’s knowledge is one of the necessities of His Essence, and for whoever is like this, change and alteration are impossible (Razi, 1411 AH, vol.
(
, 
, 
)
