چکیده:
In his categorization of the unblesseds and infidels, Mulla Sadra mentions of a group, called innate infidels, whom he believes that they are born infidels. Innate infidelity contradicts with some of the other Mulla Sadra’s views, human divine nature, which is mentioned in Quran, human free will, and the unity of human genesis. We will show that the motivation of infidelity in human without power won’t result in infidelity or determination. Human tendency to infidelity is in consistency with his/her divine nature and its consequences like eagerness to the pure beneficence because human nature is a synthesis of different desires.
خلاصه ماشینی:
A Critical Review of Innate Disbelief from the Perspective of Sadr al-Muta'allihin Sepideh Shafiei 1, Janan Izadi 2 (Article Received: 19/01/2020 - Article Accepted: 12/07/2020) Abstract Sadr al-Din al-Shirazi, in his classification of the wretched and disbelievers, mentions a group called the “innately disbelieving” (kafir fitri), which refers to the existence of a predisposition to disbelief in the primordial nature of some souls.
Then, in detailing the matter, he says: “The unfortunate ones are of two groups: either those who are rejected from the beginning, whose promise of torment is certain and inevitable, and they are people of complete disbelief and veil due to their harshness of temperament and density of nature, or the hypocrites who, in the origin and source of their innate nature, had the ability to acquire light according to their creation and existential world, but their hearts were placed in a severe veil due to the dominance of doubt, which is the result of acquiring vile psychic traits and…; these have the most severe torment.
However, in any case, the consequence of the existence of the inclination towards disbelief in the original essence of some disbelievers is that the nature of all human beings is not equal at first; rather, some are predisposed to accepting knowledge and guidance, and some are deprived of such predisposition from the very beginning, which leads us to two serious questions: 1.
(
, 
, 
)
