چکیده:
American politics and behavioral patterns are accompanied by contradictory evidence and components in the field of international security. America, which is considered an absolute international power, faces international and regional vulnerabilities that make its policies changeable. The US military force is more extensive than other major powers, its economic power is greater than the European Union, and it has economic potential compared to the three countries of Japan, Russia, and China. However, American foreign policy is framed within the framework of empire states to play the role of an emperor in international relations, which can be seen in the form of proactive operation patterns, opposition to the proliferation of strategic weapons, and arms control. This process has created completely heterogeneous results and consequences for America, and the formation of the Bush administration's national security strategy has faced widespread criticism and significant confusion related to the core of Bush's security policy. Therefore, the national security strategy and the trend of American intervention in the Middle East will be accompanied by changes based on these challenges and criticisms. The new trend of pressure diplomacy can be considered as an alternative option to the strategy of proactive operations.
خلاصه ماشینی:
However, US foreign policy has taken the form of imperial states to play the role of an emperor in international relations, which can be seen in the form of preemptive operation patterns, opposition to the proliferation of strategic weapons, and arms control.
This process has created completely heterogeneous results and consequences for the United States, and the formation of the national security strategy of the Bush administration has faced widespread criticism and considerable confusion related to the core of Bush's security policy.
Therefore, the national security strategy and the trend of American intervention in the Middle East will change based on these challenges and criticisms.
Therefore, the hypothesis of the existing article emphasizes that the development of regional crises and The disputes in the Middle East are a sign of a contradiction of power in the structure and political processes of America.
They sought to create a balance of power at the international level and, based on this, to organize any American military action in regional areas within a multilateral framework.
What is stated in the American National Security Document is based on preemptive actions to minimize the power and capabilities of challenging forces.
America's new pattern in the implementation process of preemptive operations can be seen in line with utilizing the political and strategic capabilities of other countries, especially European units.
382( Given the limitations of America's structural power in controlling regional and international crises, this country will change its behavioral pattern in a phased manner.
(
, 
, 
)
